首页> 外文期刊>Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry: An International Research, Review and News Journal >Social dysfunction in mood disorders and schizophrenia: Clinical modulators in four independent samples
【24h】

Social dysfunction in mood disorders and schizophrenia: Clinical modulators in four independent samples

机译:情绪障碍和精神分裂症中的社会功能障碍:四个独立样品中的临床调制器

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction: Social dysfunction is a common symptom of several neuropsychiatric disorders. However, only in the last few years research began to systematically investigate clinical aspects of this relevant outcome. Interestingly, its distribution and link with other clinical variables is still unclear. This study investigated social dysfunction in 4 different cohorts of patients affected by mood disorders and schizophrenia to evaluate 1) the degree of social dysfunction in these populations; 2) the associations among social dysfunction and socio-demographic and psychopathological features. Methods: Data from 4 independent studies (CATIE, GSRD ES1, ES2 and ES3, STAR"D, STEP-BD) were investigated. Behavioural and affective indicators of social dysfunction were derived and operationalized from scales or questionnaire items related to the interaction with relatives, friends and significant people in patients affected by schizophrenia (N = 765) and mood disorders (N = 2278 + 1954 + 1829). In particular the social dysfunction indicator was derived from Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) for GSRD sample, from the Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) for STAR*D sample, from the Life-Range of Impaired Functioning Tool (LRIFT) for STEP-BD sample, and from the Quality of Life Scale (QOLS) for CATIE sample. The distribution of social dysfunction was described and association with socio-demographic and psychopathological characteristics were analysed. Results: Social dysfunction indicators showed a broad distribution in all samples investigated. Consistently across studies, social dysfunction was associated with higher psychopathological severity (all samples except CATIE) and suicide risk (GSRD ES1 and ES2, STAR"D, and STEP-BD) that explain up to 47% of the variance, but also to lower education level (GSRD ES2, STAR"D, CATIE, and STEP-BD), poorer professional/work status (GSRD ES2 and ES3, STAR"D, CATIE, and STEP-BD), marital status (STAR*D and CATIE), age (younger age in GSRD ES1 and STAR"D, older age in CATIE), higher BMI (GSRD ES2 and ES3, and STEP-BD), and smoking (GSRD ES2 and ES3). Conclusion: Our results demonstrated that a significant percentage of patients affected by both mood disorders and schizophrenia shows relevant social dysfunction. Social dysfunction is related, but not completely explained by psychopathological severity. In several patients, it tends to persist also during remission state. Socio-demographic and lifestyle factors were also found to play a role and should therefore be taken into consideration in further studies investigating social dysfunction.
机译:简介:社会功能障碍是几种神经精神疾病的常见症状。然而,只有在过去几年的研究中只开始系统地调查这种相关结果的临床方面。有趣的是,其与其他临床变量的分布和链接仍然不清楚。本研究调查了4种不同群体的社会功能障碍,受情绪障碍影响的患者和精神分裂症评估1)这些人群的社会功能障碍程度; 2)社会功能障碍和社会人口统计学和精神病理学特征的协会。方法:研究了4个独立研究的数据(CATIE,GSRD ES1,ES2和ES3,星星“D,Step-BD)。从与亲属互动相关的尺度或问卷项目来源和运作社会功能障碍的行为和情感指标受精神分裂症(n = 765)和情绪障碍影响的患者的朋友和重要人物(n = 2278 + 1954 + 1829)。特别是社会功能障碍指标来自来自工作的GSRD样本的Sheehan残疾秤(SDS)与STAP-BD样品的损伤功能工具(LRIFT)的生命范围和STEP-BD样品的生命范围,以及用于CATIE样本的寿命范围(QOL)的质量,社会调整规模(WSA)。社会功能障碍的分布被描述并分析了社会人口统计和精神病理学特征的关联。结果:社会功能障碍指标在调查的所有样品中显示出广泛的分布。贯穿研究,社会乐观功能与更高的精神病理严重程度有关(除了CATIE之外的所有样品)和自杀风险(GSRD ES1和ES2,星星“D和Step-BD),其解释了差异的47%,而且降低教育水平(GSRD ES2 ,明星“D,CATIE和Step-BD),较差的专业/工作状态(GSRD ES2和ES3,星星”D,CATIE和Step-BD),婚姻状况(明星* D和CATIE),年龄(年龄较小在GSRD ES1和明星“D,CATIE旧时代),较高的BMI(GSRD ES2和ES3和STEP-BD),吸烟(GSRD ES2和ES3)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,受情绪障碍和精神分裂症影响的患者的显着比例显示出相关的社会功能障碍。社会功能障碍有关,但不完全通过精神病理严重程度彻底解释。在几个患者中,在缓解状态下也持续存在。也发现社会人口和生活方式因素发挥作用,因此在进一步研究调查社会功能障碍的进一步研究中应考虑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号