首页> 外文期刊>Psychopharmacology >Computational modelling reveals contrasting effects on reinforcement learning and cognitive flexibility in stimulant use disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder: remediating effects of dopaminergic D2/3 receptor agents
【24h】

Computational modelling reveals contrasting effects on reinforcement learning and cognitive flexibility in stimulant use disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder: remediating effects of dopaminergic D2/3 receptor agents

机译:计算建模揭示了对兴奋剂使用障碍和强迫性疾病中增强学习和认知灵活性的对比作用:多巴胺能D2 / 3受体剂的补救效应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Rationale Disorders of compulsivity such as stimulant use disorder (SUD) and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) are characterised by deficits in behavioural flexibility, some of which have been captured using probabilistic reversal learning (PRL) paradigms. Objectives This study used computational modelling to characterise the reinforcement learning processes underlying patterns of PRL behaviour observed in SUD and OCD and to show how the dopamine D-2/3 receptor agonist pramipexole and the D-2/3 antagonist amisulpride affected these responses. Methods We applied a hierarchical Bayesian method to PRL data across three groups: individuals with SUD, OCD, and healthy controls. Participants completed three sessions where they received placebo, pramipexole, and amisulpride, in a double-blind placebo-controlled, randomised design. We compared seven models using a bridge sampling estimate of the marginal likelihood. Results Stimulus-bound perseveration, a measure of the degree to which participants responded to the same stimulus as before irrespective of outcome, was significantly increased in SUD, but decreased in OCD, compared to controls (on placebo). Individuals with SUD also exhibited reduced reward-driven learning, whilst both the SUD and OCD groups showed increased learning from punishment (nonreward). Pramipexole and amisulpride had similar effects on the control and OCD groups; both increased punishment-driven learning. These D-2/3-modulating drugs affected the SUD group differently, remediating reward-driven learning and reducing aspects of perseverative behaviour, amongst other effects. Conclusions We provide a parsimonious computational account of how perseverative tendencies and reward- and punishment-driven learning differentially contribute to PRL in SUD and OCD. D-2/3 agents modulated these processes and remediated deficits in SUD in particular, which may inform therapeutic effects.
机译:诸如兴奋剂使用障碍(SUD)和强迫性疾病(OCD)的基本型强制性疾病的特征在于行为灵活性的缺陷,其中一些已经使用概率逆转学习(PRL)范式捕获。目的本研究使用了计算模型来表征增强学习过程,以在sud和OCD中观察到的PRL行为的潜在模式,并展示多巴胺D-2/3受体激动剂普拉米脂和D-2/3拮抗剂氨基丙烯酯影响这些反应。方法我们将分层贝叶斯方法应用于三组的PRL数据:具有SUD,OCD和健康控制的个人。参与者完成了三个会议,他们在双盲安慰剂的随机设计中获得了三个会议,在那里,他们收到了安慰剂,普拉克索和Amusullide。我们使用边际可能性的桥接采样估计比较了七种模型。结果刺激持续防止,参与者与在同一刺激相同的刺激程度的衡量标准,在不论结果中,在苏打水肿中显着增加,但与对照(在安慰剂上)相比,OCD中减少。苏打多联的个人也表现出奖励驱动的学习,虽然苏打和强迫团体均表现出从惩罚中的学习增加(非人)。普拉克索和氨基丙烯醚对对照和OCD组具有类似的影响;既增加了惩罚驱动的学习。这些D-2/3调制药物影响了SUD组的不同,补救了奖励驱动的学习和减少持续性行为的方面,以及其他效果。结论我们提供了一个令人矛盾的计算说明,对苏丹和强迫症的持续性倾向和奖励和惩罚和惩罚驱动的学习如何差异贡献。 D-2/3代理商调制这些过程,特别是苏打水肿的补救缺陷,这可能会通知治疗效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号