首页> 外文期刊>Psychonomic bulletin & review >Composing lexical versus functional adjectives: Evidence for uniformity in the left temporal lobe
【24h】

Composing lexical versus functional adjectives: Evidence for uniformity in the left temporal lobe

机译:构成词汇与功能形容词:左颞叶均匀的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Featural information (e.g., color or shape) allows interlocutors to focus their attention on the specific items under discussion from the vast set of possibilities in the environment. Intriguingly, when they are used to modify and restrict nouns, adjectives can either carry featural information themselves (e.g., green car) or retrieve featural information from the context (e.g., somebody points at a car and claims that she has the same car or a different car). Do the processing of same/different car and green car share neural correlates? For the composition of nouns with feature-carrying adjectives, prior work revealed early compositional effects (roughly 200 ms after noun onset) in the left anterior temporal lobe. However, although we know that such effects do not extend to cases of numeral quantification, which add no conceptual features to the noun (e.g., two boats), we do not know whether they extend to functional adjectives that themselves introduce no features, but instead reference features in the context. To address this question, we measured magnetoencephalography (MEG) during the processing of five types of noun phrases (NPs): same NPs (e.g., same star), different NPs (e.g., different star), color NPs (e.g., green star), comparative NPs (e.g., larger star), and another NPs (e.g., another star). Our main finding was that between 185 to 240 ms after noun onset, same and different NPs patterned with the color NPs in their elicited left temporal lobe activity, and same NPs even trended toward higher amplitudes than the color NPs. This shows that the mechanism driving combinatory effects in the left temporal cortex does not require the input words to directly name conceptual features, as long as the words reference featural information in the context, and that overlapping neural correlates underlie the composition of featural information from both linguistic and nonlinguistic sources.
机译:特征信息(例如,颜色或形状)允许对话者将他们的注意力集中在环境中的大量可能性下的特定项目。当他们用于修改和限制名词时,可以感兴趣地,形容词可以携带特征信息本身(例如,绿色汽车)或从上下文中检索特色信息(例如,某人在汽车中指向和声称她有同一辆车或者不同的车)。处理相同/不同的汽车和绿色汽车的处理是否存在神经相关性?对于具有特征形容词的名词的组成,在左前颞叶中,现有的工作显示出早期的成分效应(在名词开始后约200ms)。然而,虽然我们知道这些效果不会延伸到数字量化的情况,但是没有向名词(例如,两艘船只)没有概念特征,我们不知道它们是否延伸到自己没有功能的功能形容词,但是上下文中的引用功能。为了解决这个问题,我们在处理五种类型的名词短语(NPS)期间测量磁性脑图(MEG):相同的NPS(例如,相同的星星),不同的NPS(例如,不同的星星),彩色NPS(例如,绿星) ,比较NPS(例如,较大的星星)和另一个NPS(例如,另一星)。我们的主要发现是,在名词发作后的185至240毫秒之间,与其引发的左颞叶活动中的彩色NPS图案化的相同和不同的NPS,甚至比彩色NPS趋向于较高幅度的NPS。这表明,在左时间内皮层中的机制驾驶组合效应不需要输入字直接名称概念特征,只要语言中的字样参考特色信息,并且重叠的神经相关联而分从两者之间的特征信息的构成语言和非统计来源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号