...
首页> 外文期刊>Psychogeriatrics : >Defining Neuropsychiatric Inventory scale differences across frontotemporal dementia syndromes
【24h】

Defining Neuropsychiatric Inventory scale differences across frontotemporal dementia syndromes

机译:定义神经精神清析尺度横跨思考痴呆症综合征的差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aim The aim of this study was to assess the ability of Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) scale profiles to differentiate between distinct frontotemporal dementia (FTD) subtypes. Methods The NPI was used to assess 311 older patients who had been clinically diagnosed with FTD. FTD subtypes included behavioural variant FTD (bvFTD, n = 121), primary progressive aphasia (semantic variant (n = 69), non-fluent agrammatic variant (n = 31), and logopenic variant (n = 0)), FTD-motor neuron disease (n = 4), progressive supranuclear palsy (n = 43), and corticobasal syndrome (n = 43). Total NPI score and scores for each NPI item were correlated across the distinct FTD subtypes. Results Patients with bvFTD showed significantly greater impairment on their total NPI score than patients with corticobasal syndrome (P 0.001), non-fluent agrammatic variant primary progressive aphasia (P 0.001), progressive supranuclear palsy (P = 0.002), and semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (P = 0.010). Aggressiveness, euphoria, apathy, disinhibition, irritability, aberrant motor behaviours, and appetite disturbance were significantly higher in bvFTD than in the other subgroups. The lowest NPI scores were generally shown among those with CBS. However, NPI total and specific item values overlapped among the subtypes. Conclusions Patients with bvFTD showed significantly greater neuropsychiatric dysfunction than those with the other FTD subtypes, as measured by the NPI scale. In contrast, patients with corticobasal syndrome had a comparatively healthier profile. Therefore, differential diagnosis among the FTD subtypes may be guided by the NPI, although the subtype is unlikely to be confirmed on the basis of NPI alone.
机译:目的本研究的目的是评估神经精神存量库存(NPI)尺度谱的能力,以区分不同的额颞痴呆(FTD)亚型。方法采用NPI评估311名已被FTD诊断的患者。 FTD亚型包括行为变体FTD(BVFTD,N = 121),初级渐进性失语症(语义变体(n = 69),非流通式辐射变型(n = 31)和逻辑敏感(n = 0)),FTD电动机神经元疾病(n = 4),进行渐进式核麻痹(n = 43)和皮质缺卵综合征(n = 43)。每个NPI项目的总NPI分数和分数都与不同的FTD亚型相关联。结果BVFTD患者对其总NPI得分的损伤显着更大,而不是皮质缺鼠综合征(P <0.001),非流畅的ACRAMMATIAL初级进展性失血病(P <0.001),进展上核麻痹(P = 0.002),和语义变异原发性渐进性失语症(P = 0.010)。 BVFTD的侵略性,欣快感,呼吸,令人不安,烦躁,异常运动行为和食欲性低于其他亚组。最低的NPI分数通常在CBS中显示。但是,亚型中的NPI总值和特定项目值重叠。结论BVFTD的患者显着大的神经精神功能障碍,而不是NPI尺度测量的其他FTD亚型的神经精神功能障碍。相比之下,患有皮质疾病综合征的患者具有相对更健康的概况。因此,可以由NPI引导FTD亚型之间的差异诊断,尽管仅仅基于NPI来确认亚型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号