首页> 外文期刊>Progress in Artificial Intelligence >Improvement cues of lesion absorption using the adjuvant therapy of traditional Chinese medicine Qinbudan tablet for retreatment pulmonary tuberculosis with standard anti-tuberculosis regimen
【24h】

Improvement cues of lesion absorption using the adjuvant therapy of traditional Chinese medicine Qinbudan tablet for retreatment pulmonary tuberculosis with standard anti-tuberculosis regimen

机译:用辅助治疗中药秦巴丹片剂治疗肺结核标准抗结核方案的改善提示病变疗法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BackgroundChina is the second highest pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) burden country worldwide. However, retreatment of PTB has often developed resistance to at least one of the four first-line anti-TB drugs. The cure rate (approximately 50.0-73.3%) and management of retreatment of PTB in China needs to be improved. Qinbudan decoction has been widely used to treat PTB in China since the 1960s. Previously clinical studies have shown that the Qinbudan tablet (QBDT) promoted sputum-culture negative conversion and lesion absorption. However, powerful evidence from a randomized controlled clinical trial is lacking. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of QBDT as an adjunct therapy for retreatment of PTB.MethodsWe conducted a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial in China. People diagnosed with PTB were enrolled who received previous anti-TB treatment from April 2011 to March 2013. The treatment group received an anti-TB regimen and QBDT, and the control group was administered an anti-TB regimen plus placebo. Anti-TB treatment options included isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide, ethambutol, streptomycin for 2 months (2HRZES), followed by isoniazid, rifampicin, ethambutol for 6 months (6HRE), daily for 8 months. Primary outcome was sputum-culture conversion using the MGIT 960 liquid medium method. Secondary outcomes included lung lesion absorption and cavity closure. Adverse events and reactions were observed after treatment. A structured questionnaire was used to record demographic information and clinical symptoms of all subjects. Data analysis was performed by SPSS 25.0 software in the full analysis set (FAS) population.ResultsOne hundred eighty-one cases of retreatment PTB were randomly divided into two groups: the placebo group (88 cases) and the QBDT group (93 cases). A total of 166 patients completed the trial and 15 patients lost to follow-up. The culture conversion rate of the QBDT group and placebo group did not show a noticeable improvement by using the covariate sites to correct the rate differences (79.6% vs 69.3%; rate difference=0.10, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.02-0.23; F=2.48, P=0.12) after treatment. A significant 16.6% increase in lesion absorption was observed in the QBDT group when compared with the placebo group (67.7% vs 51.1%; rate difference=0.17, 95% CI: 0.02-0.31; chi (2)=5.56, P=0.02). The intervention and placebo group did not differ in terms of cavity closure (25.5% vs 21.1%; rate difference=0.04, 95% CI: -0.21-0.12; chi (2)=0.27, P=0.60). Two patients who received chemotherapy and combined QBDT reported pruritus/nausea and vomiting.ConclusionsNo significant improvement in culture conversion was observed for retreatment PTB with traditional Chinese medicine plus standard anti-TB regimen. However, QBDT as an adjunct therapy significantly promoted lesion absorption, thereby reducing lung injury due to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection.Trial registrationThis trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02313610.
机译:BackgroundChina是全球第二次最高肺结核(PTB)负担国家。然而,PTB的后退通常已经为四种一线抗结核药物中的至少一种产生了抗性。需要改进治愈率(约50.0-73.3%)和中国PTB撤退的管理。自20世纪60年代以来,秦布丹汤中已广泛用于治疗中国PTB。以前的临床研究表明,秦巴丹片剂(QBDT)促进了痰培养负转化和病变吸收。然而,缺乏来自随机对照临床试验的强大证据。因此,本研究的目的是将QBDT的疗效和安全性与PTB的辅助疗法进行比较。方法在中国进行多中心,随机,双盲,安慰剂对照临床审判。诊断出PTB的人们注册了从2011年4月到2013年4月获得的抗结核病治疗。治疗组接受了抗结核病方案和QBDT,对照组进行了抗结核纲要加安慰剂。抗TB治疗方案包括异烟肼,利福平,吡嗪酰胺,乙胺醇,链霉素2个月(2Hzes),其次是异烟肼,利福平,乙胺醇6个月(6Hre),每日8个月。主要结果是使用MgIT 960液体培养基方法的痰培养转化。二次结果包括肺病灶吸收和腔闭合。治疗后观察到不良事件和反应。结构化问卷用于记录所有受试者的人口统计信息和临床症状。数据分析由SPSS 25.0软件在完整的分析集(FAS)群体中进行。百分之百八十一例后退PTB随机分为两组:安慰剂组(88例)和QBDT组(93例)。共有166名患者完成了试验,15名患者失去了随访。 QBDT组和安慰剂组的培养转化率通过使用协变量校正速率差异(79.6%Vs 69.3%;速率差分= 0.10,95%置信区间(CI):-0.02 - 处理后0.23; f = 2.48,p = 0.12)。与安慰剂组相比,在QBDT组中观察到病变吸收增加的显着16.6%(67.7%Vs 51.1%;速率差= 0.17,95%CI:0.02-0.31; Chi(2)= 5.56,P = 0.02 )。干预和安慰剂组在腔封闭方面没有差异(25.5%vs21.1%;速率差= 0.04,95%CI:-0.21-0.12; Chi(2)= 0.27,P = 0.60)。两名接受化疗和合并QBDT的患者报告瘙痒/恶心和呕吐。与中医加上标准抗结核病方案的再生PTB,观察到培养转化率显着提高。然而,QBDT作为辅助疗法显着促进病变吸收,从而降低了结核分枝杆菌感染引起的肺损伤.TRIAL resignthis试验在ClinCORICLTIALS.gov,NCT02313610中登记。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号