首页> 外文期刊>Preventive Medicine: An International Journal Devoted to Practice and Theory >Social marketing and community mobilisation to reduce underage alcohol consumption in Australia: A cluster randomised community trial
【24h】

Social marketing and community mobilisation to reduce underage alcohol consumption in Australia: A cluster randomised community trial

机译:社会营销和社区动员减少澳大利亚的未成年酒精消费:一组随机社区审判

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background and aimsIn many countries adolescent alcohol use is a major health problem. To supplement national policies, it is important to trial community interventions as a potential strategy to prevent adolescent alcohol use. MethodsThis study evaluated a multicomponent community intervention that included community mobilisation, social marketing, and the monitoring of alcohol sales to minors. Evaluation was a clustered randomised trial design with 14 intervention and 14 control communities. Prior to randomisation, communities were matched on socioeconomic status and location. Intervention communities were not blinded. Participants3545 Year 8 students (M?=?12?years) were surveyed at baseline from 75 schools; 3377 students were surveyed post intervention in 2013 from 54 schools. OutcomesIt was hypothesised that the primary outcome, individual alcohol consumption in last 30?days, after the intervention would be 15% lower in intervention communities. Secondary outcomes were consumption in the past year and intention not to drink before age 18. ResultsThe intervention communities showed larger relative reductions compared to the controls in last 30-day consumption and past year (10%), but not significantly different. A significantly lower proportion of participants in the intervention community (63%), compared to the controls (71%), reported intending to drink before 18?years old. Subgroup analysis identified regional and state differences for some secondary measures. ConclusionsIntervention assignment was associated with lower adolescent intention to drink before the age of 18. However, more intensive and longer-term intervention may be required to measure significant differences in behaviour change.Trial registration: ACTRN12612000384853.Protocol: Rowland B, Toumbourou JW, Osborn A, et al. BMJ Open 2013;3:e002423. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002423.
机译:背景和AIMSIN许多国家青少年酒精使用是一个重大的健康问题。为了补充国家政策,审判社区干预措施是防止青少年饮酒的潜在策略。方法研究评估了包括社区动员,社会营销和对未成年人的酒精销售监测的多组分社区干预。评估是一个聚类随机试验设计,具有14个干预和14个控制社区。在随机化之前,社区与社会经济地位和地点相匹配。干预社区没有蒙蔽。参与者3545年8年学生(M?=?12?年)在75所学校的基线进行了调查; 3377名学生于54所学校调查了2013年的帖子干预。 Outcomesit是假设的,初级结果,最近30人的单个酒精消费,干预后的干预后的干预社区将降低15%。二次结果在过去一年中的消费和意图在18岁之前不喝酒。结果,与过去30天消费的对照相比,干预社区表现出更大的相对减少,并与过去一年(10%)相比,但没有显着差异。与对照组(71%)相比,干预界的参与者比例显着降低了(63%)(71%),据报道预先饮用18岁以上。亚组分析确定了一些次要措施的区域和国家差异。结论InsionIntionsitionssion与18岁之前饮用的较低的青少年意图有关。但是,可能需要更加密切化的干预措施来衡量行为变化的显着差异.Tial注册:ACTRN12612000384853.Protocol:罗兰德B,Toumbourou JW,Osborn A等人。 BMJ开放2013; 3:E002423。 DOI:10.1136 / BMJOPEN-2012-002423。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号