...
首页> 外文期刊>Preventive Medicine: An International Journal Devoted to Practice and Theory >Steps, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, and cardiometabolic profiles
【24h】

Steps, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, and cardiometabolic profiles

机译:步骤,中度至剧烈的身体活动,以及心脏差异曲线

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The relative benefits of meeting the current moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA) and active step count recommendations are unknown. Using robust linear regressions, we compared cardiometabolic marker differences (blood pressure, lipid levels, Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR), hemoglobin A1C, C-reactive protein (CRP), and body mass index (BMI)) across MVPA (150 min/week) and step (10,000 steps/day) thresholds and between step categories (low active: 5000 to 7499, somewhat active: 7500 to 9999, and active: = 10,000 steps/day vs. inactive: 5000 steps/day) in approximately 6000 Canadian adults (41.5 years, SD 14.9). Differences across MVPA and step thresholds were similar but additional benefits were observed for BMI and A1C for the MVPA target (i.e., above vs. below 150 min/week MVPA: -1.02 kg/m(2) (95% Confidence Interval [CI] -1.25 to -0.80) and -0.04% (95% CI -0.06 to -0.02); above vs. below = 10,000 steps/day: -0.40 kg/m(2) (95% CI -0.63 to -0.16) and 0.01% (95% CI -0.01 to 0.03)). In terms of steps categories, the greatest incremental improvement was achieved at the somewhat active threshold (e.g., somewhat active vs. inactive: -0.90 kg/m(2), 95% CI -1.28 to -0.53; low active vs. inactive: -0.36 kg/m(2), 95% CI -0.73 to 0.02). Additional benefits beyond the 10,000 step/day threshold were limited (e.g., -0.93 kg/m(2), 95% CI -1.30 to -0.57). Given that most benefits to markers of cardiometabolic health were at the = 7500 step/day threshold and that there was some additional benefit across the 150 min/week MVPA threshold compared to a 10,000 steps/day threshold, we suggest aiming for = 7500 steps/day and then advancing to a 150 min/MVPA goal.
机译:满足当前中等剧烈的强度身体活动(MVPA)和主动步数建议的相对益处是未知的。使用鲁棒线性回归,我们将心肌标记差异(血压,血液水平,胰岛素抵抗(HOMA-IR),血红蛋白A1C,C反应蛋白(CRP)和体重指数(BMI)的稳态模型评估进行比较(150分钟/周)和步骤(10,000步/日)阈值以及步骤类别(低有效:5000至7499,有效:7500至9999,Active:& = 10,000步/天与非活动:& 5000个步骤/日)在大约6000名加拿大成年人(41.5岁,SD 14.9)。 MVPA和步长阈值的差异是相似的,但是对于MVPA靶的BMI和A1C观察到额外的益处(即,上述50 min /周MVPA:-1.02kg / m(2)(95%置信区间[CI] -1.25至-0.80)和-0.04%(95%CI -0.06至-0.02);上方与下面& = 10,000步/日:-0.40 kg / m(2)(95%ci -0.63至-0.16 )和0.01%(95%CI -0.01至0.03)))。就步类别而言,在稍微有效的阈值(例如,有效的Vs.不活动的阈值,95%CI -1.28至-0.53;低活性Vs.nactive: -0.36 kg / m(2),95%ci -0.73至0.02)。超出10,000步/天阈值的额外益处是有限的(例如,-0.93kg / m(2),95%CI -1.30至-0.57)。鉴于对心细素健康的数量标记的大多数益处都处于& = 7500步/天门槛,并且在150分钟/周的MVPA阈值上有一些额外的益处与10,000步/天门槛相比,我们建议旨在& = 7500步骤/日,然后前进到150分钟/ mVPA的目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号