首页> 外文期刊>Preventive Medicine: An International Journal Devoted to Practice and Theory >Using cost-effectiveness analysis to prioritize policy and programmatic approaches to physical activity promotion and obesity prevention in childhood
【24h】

Using cost-effectiveness analysis to prioritize policy and programmatic approaches to physical activity promotion and obesity prevention in childhood

机译:利用成本效益分析,优先考虑政策和童年的身体活动促进和肥胖预防的方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Participation in recommended levels of physical activity promotes a healthy body weight and reduced chronic disease risk. To inform investment in prevention initiatives, we simulate the national implementation, impact on physical activity and childhood obesity and associated cost-effectiveness (versus the status quo) of six recommended strategies that can be applied throughout childhood to increase physical activity in US school, afterschool and childcare settings. In 2016, the Childhood Obesity Intervention Cost Effectiveness Study (CHOICES) systematic review process identified six interventions for study. A microsimulation model estimated intervention outcomes 2015-2025 including changes in mean MET-hours/day, intervention reach and cost per person, cost per MET-hour change, ten-year net costs to society and cases of childhood obesity prevented. First year reach of the interventions ranged from 90,000 youth attending a Healthy Afterschool Program to 31.3 million youth reached by Active School Day policies. Mean MET-hour/ day/ person increases ranged from 0.05 MET-hour/day/person for Active PE and Healthy Afterschool to 1.29MET-hour/day/person for the implementation of New Afterschool Programs. Cost per MET-hour change ranged from cost saving to $ 3.14. Approximately 2500 to 110,000 cases of children with obesity could be prevented depending on the intervention implemented. All of the six interventions are estimated to increase physical activity levels among children and adolescents in the US population and prevent cases of childhood obesity. Results do not include other impacts of increased physical activity, including cognitive and behavioral effects. Decision-makers can use these methods to inform prioritization of physical activity promotion and obesity prevention on policy agendas. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Inc.
机译:参与建议的身体活动水平促进健康的体重和降低慢性疾病风险。为了告知预防举措的投资,我们模拟了国家实施,对体育活动和儿童肥胖的影响以及六种推荐策略的相关成本效益(与现状),这些策略可以适用于童年,以增加美国学校的体育活动,越来越多地和儿童看护设置。 2016年,儿童肥胖干预成本效益研究(选择)系统审查过程确定了六种研究干预措施。微观模型估计干预结果2015-2025,包括平均季节/日,干预率和每人的成本,每阶段的成本,对社会的十年净成本和儿童肥胖案件的预防措施。第一年的干预措施范围从90,000青年中断,参加了一个健康的兽医计划,以3130万青年达到了主动上学日政策。平均季节/日/人数增加了0.05季/天/人的活跃体育和健康兽医到1.29met-over / Day / Dial / Dials,用于实施新的粪便计划。每匹配时间的成本从节省成本到3.14美元。根据实施的干预,可能会阻止大约2500至110,000例肥胖儿童。据估计,所有六种干预措施都估计增加美国人口中儿童和青少年的身体活动水平,并防止儿童肥胖病例。结果不包括增加身体活动的其他影响,包括认知和行为效应。决策者可以利用这些方法来告知政策议程的身体活动促进和肥胖预防的优先顺序。 (c)2016年由elsevier公司发布

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号