首页> 外文期刊>Platelets >Long-term and short-term duration of thienopyridine therapy after coronary stenting in patients with chronic kidney disease a meta-analysis of literature studies
【24h】

Long-term and short-term duration of thienopyridine therapy after coronary stenting in patients with chronic kidney disease a meta-analysis of literature studies

机译:慢性肾脏疾病患者冠状动脉抵抗后硫代吡啶治疗的长期和短期持续时间慢性肾脏疾病患者的荟萃分析文献研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety outcome associated with a short and a prolonged duration of thienopyridine therapy in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) after coronary stenting. We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library from their inception to 1 January 2019 for studies comparing short and prolonged thienopyridine therapy in patients with CKD. Ischemic and bleeding events were considered as the clinical endpoints in this analysis. Odds Ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used as estimates of effect size in random-effect models. Seven studies comprising a total of 17,628 CKD patients were included in the evaluation. Prolonged duration of thienopyridine use, when compared to short-term thienopyridine, was associated with reduced risk of all-cause mortality (odds ratio 0.75, 95% confidence interval: 0.70-0.81, P< .001) and stent thrombosis (OR: 0.54, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.89; P< .001), but the odds of myocardial infarction (OR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.77-1.07; P = .23) and stroke (OR: 0.91, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.13; P = .38) did not differ according to different duration of thienopyridine. As for bleeding events, long-term thienopyridine therapy did not significantly increase the bleeding (OR: 0.95, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.14; P = .58). In these patients with CKD following PCI, prolonged thienopyridine therapy compared with short-term therapy, was associated with reduced all-cause mortality and stent thrombosis, without any significant difference in myocardial infarction, stroke, and bleeding. Thienopyridine prolongation decisions for CKD patients should be individualized after careful consideration of the benefit-risk balance.
机译:该研究旨在比较冠状动脉抵抗后慢性肾病(CKD)患者短期和长期持续的嗜尼吡啶治疗的疗效和安全结果。我们系统地将PubMed,Embase和Cochrane库中搜索到2019年1月1日,以进行比较CKD患者短期和延长的噻吩吡啶治疗的研究。缺血性和出血事件被认为是该分析中的临床终点。具有95%置信区间(CIS)的优化比率(或)用作随机效应模型中效果大小的估计。七项研究总共包括17,628名CKD患者的评估。与短期噻吩吡啶相比,噻吩吡啶使用的延长持续时间与所有原因死亡率的风险降低有关(差距0.75,95%置信区间:0.70-0.81,p <.001)和支架血栓形成(或:0.54 ,95%CI 0.32至0.89; p <.001),但心肌梗死的几率(或:0.91,95%CI:0.77-1.07; p = .23)和中风(或:0.91,95%CI 0.73至0.73 1.13; p = .38)根据噻吩吡啶的不同持续时间没有差异。至于出血事件,长期噻吩吡啶疗法没有显着增加出血(或:0.95,95%CI 0.79至1.14; P = .58)。在这些PCI后CKD患者中,与短期治疗相比,延长噻吩吡啶治疗,与减少的所有导致死亡率和支架血栓形成相关,没有任何显着差异,心肌梗塞,中风和出血。 CKD患者的噻吩吡啶延长决定应在仔细考虑受益风险平衡后占个性化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号