...
首页> 外文期刊>Prehospital emergency care >Prehospital Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Open Fractures: Practicality and Safety
【24h】

Prehospital Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Open Fractures: Practicality and Safety

机译:开放骨折的预孢子抗生素预防:实用性和安全性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objective: Early antibiotic administration has been associated with a significant decrease in infection following open fractures. However, antibiotics are most effective at a time when many patients are still being transported for care. There is limited evidence that antibiotics may be safely administered for open fractures when being transported by life-flight personnel. No such data exists for ground ambulance transport of patients with open fractures. The purpose of the study was to assess the safety and feasibility of prophylactic antibiotic delivery in the prehospital setting. Methods: We performed a prospective observational study between January 1, 2014 and May 31, 2015 of all trauma patients transferred to a level 1 trauma center by a single affiliated ground ambulance transport service. If open fracture was suspected, the patient was indicated for antibiotic prophylaxis with 2 g IV Cefazolin. Exclusion criteria included penicillin allergy, higher priority patient care tasks, and remaining transport time insufficient for administration of antibiotics. The administration of antibiotics was recorded. Patient demographics, associated injuries, priority level (1 = life threatening injury, 2 = potentially life threatening injury, 3 = non-life threatening injury), and timing of transport and antibiotic administration were recorded as well. Results: EMTs identified 70 patients during the study period with suspected open fractures. Eight reported penicillin allergy and were not eligible for prophylaxis. The patient's clinical status and transport time allowed for administration of antibiotic prophylaxis for 32 patients (51.6%). Total prehospital time was the only variable assessed that had a significant impact on administration of prehospital antibiotics (30 minutes = 66%; p < 0.001). There were no allergic reactions among patients and no needle sticks or other injuries to EMT personnel related to antibiotic administration. Conclusions: EMT personnel were able to administer prehospital antibiotic prophylaxis for a substantial portion of the identified patients without any complications for patients or providers. Given the limited training provided to EMTs prior to implementation of the antibiotic prophylaxis protocol, it is likely that further development of this initial training will lead to even higher rates of prehospital antibiotic administration for open fractures.
机译:目的:早期抗生素给药已与开裂骨折后感染的显着降低有关。然而,抗生素在许多患者仍被运输以供保险时最有效。有限的证据证据表明,当由寿命的人员运输时,可以安全地施用抗生素。没有这种数据存在开放性骨折的患者的地面救护车运输。该研究的目的是评估预先染色环境中预防性抗生素递送的安全性和可行性。方法:我们在2014年1月1日至2015年5月31日在所有创伤患者中进行了一项潜在的观察研究,通过单一附属地面救护车运输服务转移到1级创伤中心。如果怀疑打开骨折,则表明患者患者抗生素预防,含有2g IV CeFazolin。排除标准包括青霉素过敏,更高优先级患者护理任务,以及抗生素施用不足的剩余运输时间。记录了抗生素的给药。患者人口统计学,相关伤害,优先级别(1 =寿命威胁,2 =潜在危及危及伤害,3 =非寿命威胁伤害),并记录运输和抗生素给药的时间。结果:EMTS鉴定了70名患者在研究期间,疑似打开骨折。八次报告的青霉素过敏,并没有资格获得预防措施。患者的临床状态和运输时间允许给予32名患者的抗生素预防(51.6%)。总重新孢子时间是唯一评估的可变性,对疗法抗生素的给药有重大影响(30分钟= 66%; p <0.001)。患者没有过敏反应,没有针刺或其他与抗生素给药有关的EMT人员的针刺或其他伤害。结论:EMT人员能够向患者或提供者的任何并发症施用大量鉴定的患者的预孢子抗生素预防。鉴于在实施抗生素预防议定书之前向EMT提供有限的培训,这一初步培训的进一步发展可能会导致开放骨折的预孢子抗生素给药率更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号