首页> 外文期刊>Prehospital emergency care >The Use of Field Triage in Disaster and Mass Casualty Incidents: A Survey of Current Practices by EMS Personnel
【24h】

The Use of Field Triage in Disaster and Mass Casualty Incidents: A Survey of Current Practices by EMS Personnel

机译:在灾害和大规模伤亡事件中使用现场分类:EMS人员对现有实践的调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Mass casualty incident (MCI) triage and the use of triage tags to assign treatment priorities are not fully implemented despite emergency medical services (EMS) personnel training during drills and exercises. Objectives: To compare current field triage practices during both training and actual MCIs and identify any potential barriers to use. Methods: During training sessions from November 2015 through March 2016, an anonymous survey was distributed to personnel in 3 distinct types of paid full-time EMS systems: Boston EMS (2-tiered, municipal third-service); Portland Fire Department (fire department-based ALS); and Stokes County EMS (county-based ALS) combined with Forsyth County EMS (county-based ALS). Data included personnel demographics and previous participation experiences in both drill and actual MCIs. Personnel with any prior MCI experience were queried regarding triage tag use and type of algorithm used. Data on barriers to use of triage tags and methods of communication of patient information were also collected. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze responses. Results: Overall survey participation rate was 77.9% (464/596). Among all respondents, 38.7% (179/464) reported participating in both a drill and actual MCI's. In these cases, respondents reported less likely use of triage tags during actual MCI's compared to drills, (34.1vs. 91.8%, p 0.01), less likely to complete full triage (16.3vs. 68.7%, p 0.01) and less likely to employ geographical triage (56.8vs. 90.4% p 0.01). Verbal report was the most common communication method to hospitals (93.1%) when triage tags were not used. Responders reported proximity to the hospital as the most common reason for not using triage tags during an actual MCI (29.5%). Conclusions: Despite being a fundamental skill in MCI response, triage and other standard practices have not always been utilized in actual events despite training. EMS educators and disaster planners should consider strategies to better incorporate MCI practices during real world events.
机译:背景:尽管在练习和练习期间,尽管在练习和练习期间,尽管急救医疗服务(EMS)人员培训,群众伤亡事件(MCI)分类并使用分类标签以分配治疗的优先事项。目标:在培训和实际MCI期间比较当前的现场分类实践,并确定任何潜在的使用障碍。方法:在2015年11月至2016年3月的培训期间,匿名调查分发给3种不同类型付费全职EMS系统的人员:波士顿EMS(2层,市第三级服务);波特兰消防局(基于消防局的ALS);和斯托克斯县EMS(以县)联合与Forsyth County EMS(以县为基础的ALS)。数据包括人口统计学和练习和实际MCI中的先前参与体验。有关任何先前MCI经验的人员都有关于分类标签使用和使用的算法类型。还收集了用于使用分类标签的障碍和患者信息通信方法的数据。描述性统计数据用于分析响应。结果:整体调查参与率为77.9%(464/596)。在所有受访者中,38.7%(179/464)报告参加钻头和实际MCI。在这些情况下,与钻头相比,在实际MCI期间报告的受访者报告不太可能在实际MCI期间使用分类标签(34.1V。91.8%,P& 0.01),不太可能完成完整的分类(16.3Vs。68.7%,P& 0.01)并且不太可能使用地理分类(56.8Vs。90.4%P <0.01)。口头报告是在未使用分类标签时的医院(93.1%)最常见的通信方法。响应者报告靠近医院作为在实际MCI期间不使用分类标签的最常见原因(29.5%)。结论:尽管是MCI反应的基本技能,尽管尽管培训,但仍未在实际事件中始终利用分类。 EMS教育者和灾害计划人员应考虑更好地在现实世界活动期间更好地纳入MCI实践的策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号