首页> 外文期刊>Agroforestry Systems >Butterfly distribution in fragmented landscapes containing agroforestry practices in Southeastern Brazil
【24h】

Butterfly distribution in fragmented landscapes containing agroforestry practices in Southeastern Brazil

机译:在巴西东南部包含农林业实践的零散景观中的蝴蝶分布

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Agroforestry practices, such as Shaded Coffee and Homegardens, may provide habitat for forest butterflies and contribute to their conservation in fragmented agricultural landscapes. To determine the influence of agroforestry practices in an agricultural mosaic, the distribution of fruit-feeding butterflies was studied using a systematic approach that compared butterfly species richness in six land-use practices (Eucalyptus [Eucalyptus spp.], Shaded Coffee, Homegardens, Secondary Growth, Pastures, and monocultures of Cassava [Manihot esculenta] and Sugarcane [Saccharum officinarum]), and in natural habitat (secondary Forest Edge and Interior) in two study areas (agricultural landscapes). In each study area, Van Someren-Rydon butterfly traps were placed as a grid every 150iu m, creating quadrants of 2.2 and 2.4iu kmpo that encompassed the different land-use practices. Land-use, plot area, number of traps and distance to the forest were set as covariates to compare species richness values. Butterfly species composition was compared using linear discriminant analysis (LDA). With the exception of Pastures, Cassava and Sugarcane, significant differences were not identified between the rest of the agricultural land-use practices and the forest habitats (edge and interior). The species composition in the agricultural practices was however, different to that found in forest habitats. Overall, Shaded Coffee practices that represent long-term mixed tree and crop stands have a better potential of conserving forest butterfly species compared to monoculture practices.
机译:诸如遮光咖啡和家庭花园之类的农林业实践可能为森林蝴蝶提供栖息地,并有助于在零散的农业景观中保护它们。为了确定农林业实践对农业马赛克的影响,使用系统方法研究了以水果为食的蝴蝶的分布,该方法比较了六种土地利用实践中的蝴蝶物种丰富度(桉树[Eucalyptus spp。],遮光咖啡,Homegardens,中学木薯[Manihot esculenta]和甘蔗[Saccharum officinarum]的生长,牧场和单一栽培,以及两个研究区域(农业景观)的自然栖息地(次生森林边缘和内部)。在每个研究区域中,Van Someren-Rydon蝴蝶诱集装置每隔150ium放置一个网格,从而形成2.2和2.4iu kmpo的象限,涵盖了不同的土地利用实践。将土地利用,样地面积,圈套数量和与森林的距离设置为协变量,以比较物种丰富度值。使用线性判别分析(LDA)比较了蝴蝶种类的组成。除牧场,木薯和甘蔗外,其他农业土地利用方式与森林生境(边缘和内部)之间未发现明显差异。但是,农业实践中的物种组成与森林栖息地中的物种组成不同。总体而言,与单一种植实践相比,代表长期混合树种和农作物林分的遮光咖啡实践在保护森林蝴蝶种类方面具有更大的潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号