首页> 外文期刊>Plant disease management reports PDMR >Field evaluation of maturity group V late soybean cultivars to Cercospora leaf blight, frogeye leaf spot, Septoria brown spot, southern blight, and target spot in central MS, 2018
【24h】

Field evaluation of maturity group V late soybean cultivars to Cercospora leaf blight, frogeye leaf spot, Septoria brown spot, southern blight, and target spot in central MS, 2018

机译:对成熟组V后大豆叶的田间评估康斯科叶枯萎病,Frogeye叶片斑,静体褐斑褐斑,南部枯萎病,南部和瞄准斑点在中央MS,2018年

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A field evaluation of two maturity group V late soybean cultivars to Cercospora leaf blight, frogeye leaf spot, Septoria brown spot, southern blight, and target spot was performed near Raymond, MS. Soybean cultivars were planted in a Loring silt loamsoil on 20 Apr. The previous crop was corn. Plots consisted of three rows of soybean, spaced 19-in. apart, planted with 6 seed per foot of row and trimmed to a final length of 14.5 ft. The experimental design was a randomized complete block with three replications. Plots were not irrigated. Field evaluations for the presence of foliar disease were conducted at approximately R6.5 using a 0 to 9 scale whereby 0=no disease and 9=excessive disease symptoms. Leaf surface area affected was evaluated for frogeye leaf spot based on a scale of 0 to 9 where 0 = no disease present and 9 = severe frogeye leaf spot. While Cercospora leaf blight was rated based on the presence of disease on leaves (0 to 5), petioles (6), and on pods and stems (7 to 9) based on disease intensity as assessed by coloration of plant material (leaves with distinct purple coloration and petioles, pods and main stems with purple to near black coloration). Septoria brown spot and target spot were rated in a similar fashion based on the presence of the disease within the plant canopy so that 0 to 3 indicated the presence in the lower canopy, 4 to 5 in the middle canopy, 6 to 8 in the upper canopy, and 9 indicative of extensive defoliation throughout the entire plant canopy and the diseasein the upper most canopy. Southern blight was evaluated using a 0 to 9 scale taking into account the appearance of the plants in the whole plot based on the presence of white mycelia and sclerotia (fungal signs) on the base of plants as well as additional observational symptoms that included mild interveinal chlorosis and premature wilting of plants with leaves remaining. Plots exhibiting no symptoms associated with southern blight were given a 0, plots whereby approximately half of the plot were exhibiting the symptoms indicative of southern blight were given a 5, while plots exhibiting numerous plants with mycelia and sclerotia as well as severe early wilting (prior to R8) were given a 9. Plots were harvested on 3 Oct by harvesting all three rows ofsoybean. Yield was calculated by standardizing moisture to 13%. Prior to analysis, field disease evaluations were treated as ordinal data and therefore rank transformed using PROC RANK (Version 9.4, SAS Institute, Cary, NC). The resulting transformed data were subjected to analysis of variance in PROC GLM, and means were compared using Fisher's protected least significant difference (LSD) at the P=0.05 significance level. Means were back-transformed for the presentation of data. Yield data were analyzedusing the SAS GLM procedure (Version 9.3, SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Means separation was conducted using Fisher's protected least significant difference at P=0.05.
机译:雷蒙德,MS附近进行了对森孢菌叶枯萎病,Frogeye叶片,静脉褐斑,南部枯萎病和靶点。在4月20日,在一个漫游的淤泥劳沙伊尔种植了大豆品种。之前的作物是玉米。地块包括三排大豆,间隔19英寸。分开,种植每脚6个种子,并修剪到14.5英尺的最终长度。实验设计是随机完整块,具有三种复制。阴谋没有灌溉。使用0〜9刻度在约R6.5的情况下进行叶面疾病的田间评估,从而0 =没有疾病,9 =过量的疾病症状。基于0至9的等级评估叶面积受影响的叶片叶片点,其中0 =没有疾病存在,9 =严重的Frogeye叶斑。虽然Cercospora Leaf Bea Leaf Blight基于叶片(0至5),叶柄(6)和豆荚和茎(7至9)的疾病的存在,而基于植物材料着色评估的疾病强度(叶子与截然不同紫色着色和叶柄,豆荚和主要茎与紫色到黑色着色附近)。 Septoria棕色点和靶点以类似的方式评级,基于植物冠层内的疾病的存在,使0至3表示在下层的下层,4至5在中间冠层中,6至8位树冠和9表示整个植物冠层和疾病的广泛脱液,上层冠层。考虑到整个情节的植物在植物基础上的存在以及包括温和的观察者的额外观察症状剩余叶子的氯化和植物过早枯萎。没有与南方枯萎有关的症状的剧集是一个0,大约一半的情节表现出南方枯萎的症状给出了5次,而患有菌丝素和核心菌的众多植物以及严重的早期衰退的地块给R8)给出了一个9.在10月3日通过收获所有三排大厅收获地块。通过将水分标准化至13%来计算产量。在分析之前,现场疾病评估被视为序数数据,因此使用PROC等级(第9.4版,SAS Institute,Cary,NC)等级等级。将得到的转化数据进行了转化GLM的差异分析,使用Fisher的受保护最小差异(LSD)进行比较了P = 0.05显着性水平。用于对数据的呈现进行后转换的手段。产量数据正在分析SAS GLM程序(版本9.3,SAS Institute,Cary,NC)。意味着在P = 0.05的P = 0.05下使用Fisher受受的受保护最小差异进行分离。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号