首页> 外文期刊>Physiology & behavior >Acute effect of three different exercise training modalities on executive function in overweight inactive men: A secondary analysis of the BrainFit study
【24h】

Acute effect of three different exercise training modalities on executive function in overweight inactive men: A secondary analysis of the BrainFit study

机译:三种不同运动训练方式对超重无效男性执行功能的急性作用:脑精研究的二级分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There is currently a consensus about the positive effects of physical exercise on cognition. However, the exercise intensity-dependent effect on executive function remains unclear. Thus, the aim of this study was to compare the acute effects of high-intensity aerobic interval training (HIIT), progressive resistance training (PRT), or combined training (PRT?+?HIIT) on executive function indicators in overweight inactive adult men (aged 18–30?years old). The participants were screened and excluded for medical conditions known to impact cognitive functioning, which was measured with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) screening cognitive test. A randomised, parallel-group clinical trial was conducted among 36 adults who were randomly assigned to a HIIT (n?=?12), PRT (n?=?7), PRT?+?HIIT (n?=?7), or control group (n?=?10) until the energy expenditure of 400–500?kcal. Cognitive inhibition and attention capacity were examined using the Stroop test and d2 test of attention, respectively, and were obtained pre-exercise for baseline measurement and 1?min post-exercise for each exercise training modality. Cognitive inhibition measured by the Stroop test was improved after the HIIT protocol for the domains of reading by +5.89 (η2?=?0.33), colour naming +9.0 (η2?=?0.60), interference +10.1 (η2?=?0.39), and index interference +6.0 (η2?=?0.20). Additionally, the PRT?+?HIIT group had an increase for the reading condition of +7.1 (η2?=?0.40), colour naming +7.5 (η2?=?0.80), and interference +5.8 (η2?=?0.39). In regard to attentional capacity, the HIIT group elicited small to medium improvements in the concentration level domain of +21.7 (η2?=?0.44), total performance domain +56.6 (η2?=?0.50), and consistency domain ?3.0 (η2?=?0.27). These results were similar in the PRT and PRT?+?HIIT groups in the concentration level and items-processed domains (P?
机译:目前有关于体育锻炼对认知的积极影响的共识。然而,对执行功能的运动强度依赖效果仍不清楚。因此,本研究的目的是比较高强度好氧间隔训练(HIIT),渐进性抵抗训练(PRT)或联合培训(PRT?+→HIIT)的急性效应在超重无效成年男性中的执行功能指标(年龄18-30岁)。参与者被筛选并排除在熟知的医学条件下,以影响认知功能,这是用蒙特利尔认知评估(MOCA)筛查认知测试来测量的。在36名成人中进行随机的并联组临床试验,他们随机分配给HIIT(n?=?12),prt(n?=?7),prt?hiit(n?=?7),或对照组(n?=?10),直到能量支出为400-500?kcal。通过分别使用STROPOUP试验和D2检测来检查认知抑制和注意力,并获得对基线测量的预锻炼,每次运动训练模型的运动后锻炼1?min。在+5.89(η2≤= 0.33)的HITIT方案的HITIT方案后,通过+5.89(η2≤0.33),颜色命名+9.0(η2?= 0.60),干扰+10.1(η2?η2.10.3 )和索引干扰+6.0(η2?=?0.20)。另外,PRT?+ + +?HIIT组的读取条件增加(η2?= 0.40),颜色命名+7.5(η2?= 0.80),干扰+5.8(η2?= 0.39) 。关于注意力,HIIT组在浓度水平结构域中引起浓度+21.7(η2≤= 0.44)的中等改善,总性能结构域+56.6(η2≤= 0.50),以及一致性域?3.0(η2 ?=?0.27)。这些结果在PRT和PRT?+ + + + + + +上的高分子中的高分子和物品处理结构域(P?<?0.05)。总之,急性HIIT和PRT?+ + +?HIIT会话报告的重要效果大小比PRT单独用于认知抑制和注意力。成果占据表明即使短期运动干预措施也可以增强超重成年人的执行职能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号