首页> 外文期刊>Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety >To what extent do data from pharmaceutical claims under‐estimate opioid analgesic utilisation in Australia?
【24h】

To what extent do data from pharmaceutical claims under‐estimate opioid analgesic utilisation in Australia?

机译:药物索赔的数据在多大程度上估算澳大利亚估算阿片类药物镇痛药物的数据?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Abstract Purpose Although pharmaceutical claims are an essential data source for pharmacoepidemiological studies, these data potentially under‐estimate opioid utilisation. Therefore, this study aimed to quantify the extent to which pharmaceutical claims from Australia's national medicines subsidy programs (Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme [PBS] and Repatriation Schedule of Pharmaceutical Benefits [RPBS]) under‐estimate prescription‐only and total national opioid utilisation across time and for different opioids. A secondary aim was to examine the impact of the 2012 policy change to record all PBS/RPBS dispensed medicines, irrespective of government subsidy, on the degree of under‐estimation. Methods Aggregated data on Australian opioid utilisation were obtained for the 2010 to 2014 calendar years, including all single ingredient and combination opioid analgesic preparations available on prescription or over‐the‐counter (OTC). Total opioid utilisation (oral morphine equivalent kilogrammes) was quantified using sales data from IMS Health and compared with pharmaceutical claims data from the PBS/RPBS. Results PBS/RPBS claims data did not account for 12.4% of prescription‐only opioid utilisation in 2014 and 19.1% in 2010, and 18.4% to 25.4% of total opioid use when accounting for OTC preparations. Between 2010 and 2014, 5.6% to 5.3% of buprenorphine, 8.1% to 6.3% fentanyl, 17.7% to 10.7% oxycodone, 18.4% to 11.0% tramadol, 38.4% to 21.0% hydromorphone, and 28.6% to 21.0% of prescription‐only codeine utilisation were not accounted for in PBS/RPBS claims. Conclusions Despite increased capture of less expensive (under co‐payment) opioid items since 2012, PBS/RPBS claims still under‐estimate opioid use in Australia, with varying degrees across opioids. The estimates generated in this study allow us to better understand the degree of under‐estimation and account for these in research using Australia's national pharmaceutical claims data.
机译:摘要目的虽然药物权利要求是药物病变研究的必要数据来源,但这些数据可能会估算阿片类药物利用率。因此,本研究旨在量化来自澳大利亚国家药物补贴计划(药物福利计划[PBS]和药物福利遣返时间[RPBS]的遣返时间表)的程度,估计仅估计的处方和全国各种阿片类药物利用对于不同的阿片类药物。次要目的是审查2012年政策变更对所有PBS / RPBS分配药物的影响,无论政府补贴如何对估计程度。方法为2010年至2014年日历年获得了澳大利亚阿片类药物利用的汇总数据,包括可在处方或柜台(OTC)上提供的所有单一成分和组合阿片类镇痛制剂。使用来自IMS Health的销售数据量化总阿片类药物(口服吗啡等量千克),并与来自PBS / RPBS的药物权利要求数据进行比较。结果PBS / RPBS声称数据不占2014年的24.4%的处方阿片类药物利用率,2010年的19.1%,占OTC准备时,每次阿片类药物总共使用18.4%至25.4%。 2010年至2014年间,丁丙诺啡5.6%至5.3%,芬太尼8.1%至6.3%,氧基酮为17.7%至10.7%曲马多酮,38.4%至21.0%氢甲醇,28.6%至21.0%的处方 - 仅在PBS / RPB索赔中才能占疑称使用。结论尽管自2012年以来捕获更便宜(共同支付)阿片类药物以来,PBS / RPBs索赔仍在估算澳大利亚的阿片类药物,跨阿片类药物不同程度。本研究中产生的估计允许我们更好地了解使用澳大利亚国家药业索赔数据在研究中的估计程度和账户。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号