...
首页> 外文期刊>Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety >Misconceptions regarding the association between Herbalife products and liver-related case reports in Spain.
【24h】

Misconceptions regarding the association between Herbalife products and liver-related case reports in Spain.

机译:西班牙肝草原产品与肝脏相关案例报告的关联误解。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In the July 2011 issue of Pharmacoepidemiology and Drag Safety, the editorial by Manso et al discussed historical reports of consumers from Spain who had reportedly taken Herbalife products and experienced liver-related injury of varying types and severity. Herbalife would like to offer an alternative perspective which severely weakens the authors' conclusions. First, the authors state that Spanish State regulatory authorities published a report informing consumers of the risk of hepatotoxicity associated with Herbalife products. In an egregious omission, the authors failed to state that this communicado was removed by the Spanish authorities on April 15, 2009 after an extensive review of the facts and discussion involving most of these case reports with additional information that Herbalife provided to aid in the investigation. Furthermore, most of these same cases were shared by Spanish authorities with regulatory agencies globally through the World Health Organization's (WHO) UPSALA database and have not led to regulatory action by any governments. Another glaring omission by Manso et al was the fact that the WHO causality classifications were previously applied to most of these same cases, yet were not included in the authors' paper. The failure to acknowledge these assessments and instead applying the Karch/Lasagna criteria, is a major deficiency in this publication, and raises questions about the authors' scientific balance given the serious and unsubstantiated accusations about a company's whole product line. This is especially disconcerting since applying different causality assessment criteria leads to very different causality scores for a number of the cases. In fact, since the authors could not identify a causative agent with a 'known drug response' in any of these cases, none of the cases in this article would have met the Karch/Lasagna criteria for a definite, probable, or possible classification since a 'known drug response' is required for such a classification.
机译:在2011年7月的药物病态和阻力安全问题中,Manso等人的编辑讨论了据报道,据报道,据报道,据报道,据报道,据报道,据据报道,患有Herbalife产品和经验丰富的不同类型和严重程度的肝脏有关的伤害。 Herbalife希望提供一种替代的观点,严重削弱了作者的结论。首先,提交人说,西班牙国家监管机构发表了一份向消费者通知消费与肝草原产品相关的肝毒性风险的报告。在令人生意的遗漏中,提交人未能说明这一社区由西班牙当局于2009年4月15日在广泛审查涉及这些案件中的事实和讨论后,涉及本案件的其他案件报告的其他资料,以便在调查中提供援助的其他资料。此外,这些同样的案件由西班牙当局与全球监管机构共享,通过世界卫生组织(WHO)Upsala数据库,并没有导致任何政府的监管行动。 Manso等人的另一个耀眼的遗漏是,世界卫生组织因果关系分类预先应用于这些同一案例中的大多数情况,但不包括在作者文件中。未能确认这些评估并替代申请KARCH / LASAGNA标准,这是本出版物的重大缺陷,并提出了关于提交人的科学平衡的问题,因为有关公司的整个产品线的严重和未经证实的指责。这尤其令人不安,因为应用不同的因果关系评估标准,导致许多情况下的因果关系得分非常不同。事实上,由于作者无法在这些情况下具有“已知药物反应”的致病因子,本文中的任何病例都不会符合自从这种分类需要“已知的药物反应”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号