首页> 外文期刊>Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety >Misconceptions regarding the association between Herbalife products and liver-related case reports in Spain.
【24h】

Misconceptions regarding the association between Herbalife products and liver-related case reports in Spain.

机译:在西班牙,关于康宝莱产品与肝脏相关病例报告之间的关联存在误解。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In the July 2011 issue of Pharmacoepidemiology and Drag Safety, the editorial by Manso et al discussed historical reports of consumers from Spain who had reportedly taken Herbalife products and experienced liver-related injury of varying types and severity. Herbalife would like to offer an alternative perspective which severely weakens the authors' conclusions. First, the authors state that Spanish State regulatory authorities published a report informing consumers of the risk of hepatotoxicity associated with Herbalife products. In an egregious omission, the authors failed to state that this communicado was removed by the Spanish authorities on April 15, 2009 after an extensive review of the facts and discussion involving most of these case reports with additional information that Herbalife provided to aid in the investigation. Furthermore, most of these same cases were shared by Spanish authorities with regulatory agencies globally through the World Health Organization's (WHO) UPSALA database and have not led to regulatory action by any governments. Another glaring omission by Manso et al was the fact that the WHO causality classifications were previously applied to most of these same cases, yet were not included in the authors' paper. The failure to acknowledge these assessments and instead applying the Karch/Lasagna criteria, is a major deficiency in this publication, and raises questions about the authors' scientific balance given the serious and unsubstantiated accusations about a company's whole product line. This is especially disconcerting since applying different causality assessment criteria leads to very different causality scores for a number of the cases. In fact, since the authors could not identify a causative agent with a 'known drug response' in any of these cases, none of the cases in this article would have met the Karch/Lasagna criteria for a definite, probable, or possible classification since a 'known drug response' is required for such a classification.
机译:在2011年7月的《药物流行病学和药物安全》中,Manso等人的社论讨论了西班牙消费者的历史报道,他们曾服用康宝莱产品,并经历了各种类型和严重程度的肝脏相关伤害。康宝莱希望提供另一种观点,这会严重削弱作者的结论。首先,作者指出,西班牙国家监管部门发布了一份报告,告知消费者与康宝莱产品相关的肝毒性风险。一个令人震惊的遗漏是,提交人未能说明,在广泛审查了事实和讨论之后,西班牙当局于2009年4月15日取消了该禁酒令,其中涉及大多数案例报告以及康宝莱提供的有助于调查的其他信息。此外,大多数此类案件都是由西班牙当局通过世界卫生组织(WHO)UPSALA数据库与全球监管机构共享的,并未导致任何政府采取监管行动。 Manso等人另一个明显的遗漏是,WHO因果关系分类以前曾应用于大多数相同情况,但并未包括在作者的论文中。该出版物的一个主要缺陷是未能承认这些评估,而没有采用Karch / Lasagna标准,并且由于对公司整个产品线的严重和毫无根据的指责,引起了作者的科学平衡问题。这尤其令人不安,因为在许多情况下应用不同的因果关系评估标准会导致非常不同的因果关系得分。实际上,由于在这些情况下作者都无法识别出具有“已知药物反应”的病原体,因此自本文以来,没有一个案例符合Karch / Lasagna的确定,可能或可能分类标准。这种分类需要“已知药物反应”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号