首页> 外文期刊>PharmacoEconomics >Cost Effectiveness of Blinatumomab Versus Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in Adult Patients with Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in the United States
【24h】

Cost Effectiveness of Blinatumomab Versus Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in Adult Patients with Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in the United States

机译:Blinatumomab与在美国复发或难治性B细胞前体急性淋巴细胞白血病成年患者中的Blinatumomab对ozuzumab ozogamicin的成本有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background and ObjectiveThe TOWER and INO-VATE-ALL trials demonstrated the efficacy and safety of blinatumomab and inotuzumab ozogamicin (inotuzumab), respectively, versus standard-of-care (SOC) chemotherapy in adults with relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The cost effectiveness of blinatumomab versus inotuzumab has not previously been examined.MethodsCost effectiveness of blinatumomab versus inotuzumab in R/R B-cell precursor ALL patients with one or no prior salvage therapy from a United States (US) payer perspective was estimated using a partitioned survival model. Health outcomes were estimated based on published aggregate data from INO-VATE-ALL and individual patient data from TOWER weighted to match patients in INO-VATE-ALL using matching adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC). Analyses were conducted using five approaches relating to use of anchored versus unanchored comparisons of health outcomes and, for the anchored comparisons, the reference treatment to which treatment effects on health outcomes were applied. Estimates from TOWER including the probabilities of complete remission and allogeneic stem-cell transplant (allo-SCT), overall and event-free survival, utilities, duration of therapy, and use of subsequent therapies were MAIC adjusted to match INO-VATE-ALL. Costs of treatment, adverse events, allo-SCT, subsequent therapies, and terminal care were from published sources. A 50-year time horizon and 3% annual discount rate were used.ResultsIncremental costs for blinatumomab versus inotuzumab ranged from US$7023 to US$36,244, depending on the approach used for estimating relative effectiveness. Incremental quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) ranged from 0.54 to 1.78. Cost effectiveness for blinatumomab versus inotuzumab ranged from US$4006 to US$20,737 per QALY gained.ConclusionsBlinatumomab is estimated to be cost effective versus inotuzumab in R/R B-cell precursor ALL adults who have received one or no prior salvage therapy from a US payer perspective.
机译:背景和异物塔和Ino-Vate-all-all-all-all-all-ozuzubab ozogamicin(Inotuzumab)的疗效和安全性分别与成年人中复发或难治性(r / r)b-细胞前体急性淋巴细胞白血病(全部)。预先研究了Blinatumomab与Inotuzumab的成本效果。使用分组的所有患者(美国)支付者的术语(美国)支付者角度的所有患者的Blinatumomab与inotuzumab的疗效效果。生存模式。根据来自塔加权的Ino-Vate-All和个体患者数据的公布的总数据估计了健康结果,以使用匹配调整的间接比较(MAIC)与INO-Vate的患者匹配患者。使用与锚定与健康结果的锚定与未定位的锚定比较有关的五种方法进行分析,并且对于锚定比较,应用了对健康结果的治疗效果的参考处理。塔的估计包括完全缓解和同种异体干细胞移植(Allo-SCT),无需无需存活,疗法,治疗持续时间以及随后的疗法的概率,以及随后的疗法进行调整以匹配Ino-Vate-all-all。治疗成本,不良事件,Allo-SCT,随后的疗法和终端护理来自已发表的来源。使用了50年的地平线和3%的年度折扣率。Blinatumomab与Inotuzumab的一点费用为7023美元至36,244美元,具体取决于用于估算相对效率的方法。增量质量调整的寿命 - 年(QALYS)范围为0.54至1.78。 Blinatumomab与Inotuzumab的成本效益从4006美元的价格下降到20,737美元.Conclusionsblinatumomab估计是R / R B细胞前谱的成本效益,所有已收到美国付款人的成年人的成年人。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号