【24h】

Ingredients of 'rituals' and their cognitive underpinnings

机译:“仪式”的成分及其认知内限

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Ritual is not a proper scientific object, as the term is used to denote disparate forms of behaviour, on the basis of a faint family resemblance. Indeed, a variety of distinct cognitive mechanisms are engaged, in various combinations, in the diverse interactions called 'rituals' - and each of these mechanisms deserves study, in terms of its evolutionary underpinnings and cultural consequences. We identify four such mechanisms that each appear in some 'rituals', namely (i) the normative scripting of actions; (ii) the use of interactions to signal coalitional identity, affiliation, cohesiveness; (iii) magical claims based on intuitive expectations of contagion; and (iv) ritualized behaviour based on a specific handling of the flow of behaviour. We describe the cognitive and evolutionary background to each of these potential components of 'rituals', and their effects on cultural transmission. This article is part of the theme issue 'Ritual renaissance: new insights into the most human of behaviours'.
机译:仪式不是一个适当的科学对象,因为该术语用于表示在微弱的家庭相似之处的基础上的不同形式的行为。实际上,各种不同的认知机制在各种组合中,在不同的相互作用中被称为“仪式” - 而且这些机制中的每一个都应该在其进化的内限和文化后果方面值得研究。我们确定了四种这样的机制,每个机制都出现在某些“仪式”中,即(i)行动的规范性脚本; (ii)使用相互作用与信号联盟身份,隶属关系,凝聚力; (iii)基于直观的蔓延的魔法索赔; (iv)基于特定处理行为流动的仪式化行为。我们描述了对“仪式”的每个潜在成分的认知和进化背景,以及它们对文化传播的影响。本文是主题问题“仪式文艺复兴”的一部分:新见解进入最人类的行为。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号