首页> 外文期刊>Perfusion >Assessment of three methods for removing massive air in a cardiopulmonary bypass circuit: simulation-based multi-discipline training in West China Hospital
【24h】

Assessment of three methods for removing massive air in a cardiopulmonary bypass circuit: simulation-based multi-discipline training in West China Hospital

机译:评估三种方法中的三种方法在心肺旁路电路中除去巨大空气:西部医院仿真的多学科培训

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background and Objective: A multi-discipline cardiac and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) team simulation scenario was established to compare three different de-airing approaches dealing with massive air embolism in CPB, so as to formulate a standardized procedure to handle this adverse acute event more proficiently and ensure clinical safety. Method: A simulation-based clinical CPB massive air embolism scenario was developed by a cardiac and CPB team. Study Objects: Five licensed perfusionists and five CPB trainees were matched randomly into five pairs. Each pair would simulate the three different de-airing approaches separately as followed: (1) Conventional Method: arterial line filter (ALF) de-airing purge line and oxygenator self-recirculation bypass were used to de-air; (2) Arterial-Venous Loop (A-V Loop) Method: surgeons reconnected the arterial and venous lines to de-air by restoring the original priming A-V loop configuration; (3) Isolation of the ALF Method: this ensures de-bubbling of the CPB circuit, but bypasses the ALF function. Assessment Criteria: (1) Times to recovery (duration of the circulation suspension); (2) Subjective evaluation of skill and non-skill performances. Results: As to times to recovery, the Conventional Method group took 290.6 s ± 36.2, the A-V Loop Method group took 196.8 s ± 52.0 and the Isolation of ALF group took 99.4 s ± 15.1. The statistical difference is significant among the three groups (p<0.01). The subjective evaluation of training performance indicates that this simulation-based training is effective in assessing both skill and non-skill abilities. Conclusion: CPB simulation-based training was effective in comparing de-airing strategies and can instruct perfusion practices how to optimize techniques. For well-trained, multi-discipline cardiac teams, the A-V Loop Method is highly efficient and reliable in managing CPB massive air embolism. For cardiac teams that do not have this sophisticated training, the Isolation of ALF Method should be their alternative option.
机译:背景和目的:建立了多学科心脏和心肺旁路(CPB)团队模拟场景,以比较CPB中巨大空气栓塞的三种不同的脱雾方法,以制定标准化的程序,以处理这种不利急剧事件更多熟练,确保临床安全。方法:由心脏和CPB团队开发了基于仿真的临床CPB大规模空气栓塞情景。研究对象:五位许可的灌注手和五名CPB学员随机匹配成五对。每对一体都会分别模拟三种不同的脱气方法,如所示:(1)常规方法:动脉线过滤器(ALF)脱气吹扫线和氧气自再循环旁路旁路脱气; (2)动脉静脉环(A-V环)方法:外科医生通过恢复原始喷射A-V环形配置来重新连接动脉和静脉线到脱气; (3)ALF方法的分离:这确保了CPB电路的去鼓泡,但绕过了ALF功能。评估标准:(1)恢复次数(循环暂停的持续时间); (2)主观评估技能和非技能表演。结果:若要恢复,常规方法组采用290.6 S±36.2,A-V环方法组采用196.8S±52.0,ALF组的分离占99.4 s±15.1。三组中统计学差异是显着的(P <0.01)。培训性能的主观评估表明,基于模拟的培训是有效地评估技能和非技能能力。结论:CPB仿真培训在比较脱雾策略方面有效,可以指导灌注实践如何优化技术。对于训练有素的多学科心脏团队,A-V环路方法在管理CPB大规模空气栓塞方面是高效且可靠的。对于没有这种复杂培训的心脏团队,ALF方法的隔离应该是他们的替代选择。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Perfusion》 |2019年第3期|共8页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Anesthesiology West China Hospital of Sichuan University Chengdu China;

    Department of Anesthesiology West China Hospital of Sichuan University Chengdu China;

    Department of Anesthesiology West China Hospital of Sichuan University Chengdu China;

    Department of Anesthesiology West China Hospital of Sichuan University Chengdu China;

    Department of Anesthesiology West China Hospital of Sichuan University Chengdu China;

    Department of Anesthesiology West China Hospital of Sichuan University Chengdu China;

    Department of Anesthesiology West China Hospital of Sichuan University Chengdu China;

    Department of Anesthesiology West China Hospital of Sichuan University Chengdu China;

    Department of Anesthesiology West China Hospital of Sichuan University Chengdu China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 治疗学;
  • 关键词

    cardiopulmonary bypass; simulation-based training; massive air embolism; crisis management; multi-discipline training;

    机译:心肺旁路;基于模拟的培训;巨大的空中栓塞;危机管理;多学科培训;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-20 06:07:16

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号