首页> 外文期刊>Perspectives on Psychological Science >A Psychological Profile of the Alt-Right
【24h】

A Psychological Profile of the Alt-Right

机译:alt-over的心理概况

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The 2016 U.S. presidential election coincided with the rise of the "alternative right," or alt-right. Alt-right associates have wielded considerable influence on the current administration and on social discourse, but the movement's loose organizational structure has led to disparate portrayals of its members' psychology and made it difficult to decipher its aims and reach. To systematically explore the alt-right's psychology, we recruited two U.S. samples: An exploratory sample through Amazon's Mechanical Turk (N = 827, alt-right n = 447) and a larger, nationally representative sample through the National Opinion Research Center's Amerispeak panel (N = 1,283, alt-right n = 71-160, depending on the definition). We estimate that 6% of the U.S. population and 10% of Trump voters identify as alt-right. Alt-right adherents reported a psychological profile more reflective of the desire for group-based dominance than economic anxiety. Although both the alt-right and non-alt-right Trump voters differed substantially from non-alt-right, non-Trump voters, the alt-right and Trump voters were quite similar, differing mainly in the alt-right's especially high enthusiasm for Trump, suspicion of mainstream media, trust in alternative media, and desire for collective action on behalf of Whites. We argue for renewed consideration of overt forms of bias in contemporary intergroup research.
机译:2016年美国总统选举恰逢“替代权利”的崛起或“替代方”。 ALT-Lock Associates对当前行政管理和社会话语产生了相当大的影响,但该运动的宽松组织结构导致其成员心理学的描绘并使其难以破译其目标和覆盖。为了系统地探索alt-over的心理学,我们招募了两个美国样本:通过亚马逊的机械土耳其人(n = 827,alt-right n = 447)以及通过国家舆论研究中心的amerispeak小组( n = 1,283,Alt-Right n = 71-160,具体取决于定义)。我们估计美国人口的6%和10%的特朗普选民认为是alt-over。 ALT-Right Accerents报告了一种心理学概况,对基于群体的统治性的愿望更加反映了比经济焦虑的潜力。虽然Alt-Right和Non-Alt-Right Trump选民的差异很大,但从非ALT-LOTES,非特朗普选民,ALT-RIGHT和TRUMP选民非常相似,差异主要是ALT-over的特别高度热情特朗普,怀疑主流媒体,信任替代媒体,代表白人渴望集体行动。我们争辩于当代互动研究中的明显形式偏见的考虑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号