...
首页> 外文期刊>Perspectives on Psychological Science >The Killing of Kitty Genovese: What Else Does This Case Tell Us?
【24h】

The Killing of Kitty Genovese: What Else Does This Case Tell Us?

机译:杀害凯蒂尼比夫:这是什么意思告诉我们?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Well known in popular culture, the 1964 murder of Kitty Genovese in Queens, New York, became famous because not one of an alleged 38 bystanders called police until it was too late. Within psychology, this singular event inspired the study of bystander intervention. With the spotlight of history focused on Ms. Genovese and bystanders, other events, also profound for what they tell us about human social behavior, have escaped public notice. Based on archival records and current interviews, this article describes the three issues linked to Genovese. First, three false confessions, taken from two individuals, led to their wrongful convictions and imprisonment. One of these individuals was cited by the U.S. Supreme Court in Miranda v. Arizona (1966); the other individual is alive and well and wants to clear his name. Second, the narrative of the unresponsive bystander was initiated by police, not by journalists, in response to probing questions about one of these confessions. Finally, there is the ironic fact, which somehow has slipped through the cracks, that the killer of Genovese was ultimately captured as a result of the intervention of two bystanders.
机译:众所周知,1964年纽约皇后队杀害了Kitty Genovese,成名,因为不是一个叫警察的38个旁观者,直到它为时已晚。在心理学中,这个单一活动激发了对旁观者干预的研究。随着历史的聚焦,重点关注Genovese女士和旁观者,其他事件,也深刻地为他们告诉我们关于人类社会行为而言,已逃脱公告。本文根据档案记录和当前访谈,介绍了与Genovese相关的三个问题。首先,从两个人那里取出三个错误的忏悔,导致了他们的错误定罪和监禁。其中一个人被Miranda v的美国最高法院引用。亚利桑那州(1966年);另一个人活着,并希望清除他的名字。其次,针对这些审议之一的探讨问题,警方不受记者发起的非反应旁观者的叙述。最后,有一个讽刺的事实,以某种方式通过裂缝滑动,因为两种旁观者的干预导致了Genovese的杀手最终被捕获。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号