...
首页> 外文期刊>Pediatric transplantation. >Assessment of prophylactic heparin infusion as a safe preventative measure for thrombotic complications in pediatric kidney transplant recipients weighing <20?kg
【24h】

Assessment of prophylactic heparin infusion as a safe preventative measure for thrombotic complications in pediatric kidney transplant recipients weighing <20?kg

机译:预防性肝素输注的评估作为称重儿科肾移植受者的血栓和血栓反应性的安全预防措施<20μk

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Abstract Small‐sized kidney recipients (20?kg) are at high risk of allograft vessel thrombosis. HP has been used to mitigate this risk but may infer an increase in bleeding risks. Therefore, we aim to determine whether HP is a safe means to prevent thrombosis in small kidney transplant patients by comparing those who have received HP and those who have NHP. A retrospective review of patients??20?kg who underwent kidney transplant in our institution from 2000 to 2015 was performed. At our institution, unfractionated heparin 10?units/kg/hour is used as HP since 2009. Patients at increased risk of thrombosis (previous thrombosis, thrombophilia, nephrotic syndrome) and bleeding (therapeutic doses of heparin, diagnosis of coagulopathy) were excluded. Fifty‐six patients were identified (HP n?=?46; NHP n?=?10). Baseline demographics were similar between HP and NHP. There was no statistical difference in frequency of transfusions, surgical re‐exploration, or thrombotic events between HP and NHP. The HP group was more likely to have drop in Hb??20?g/L (67.4% vs 30.0%, P ?=?0.038), and those who had drop in Hb??20?g/L were more likely to also require pRBC transfusions (63.0% vs 20.0%, P ?=?0.017). Within the HP group, those who had bleeding complications had similar Hb levels as those who did not at baseline and post‐transplant. Outcomes in the HP and NHP groups were no different with respect to thrombosis or significant bleeding complications requiring pRBC transfusions or surgical intervention. Future prospective studies are required to investigate the balance of preventing thrombosis and risks of pRBC transfusions for small‐sized kidney recipients.
机译:摘要小型肾脏受体(& 20?kg)是同种异体移植血管血栓形成的高风险。惠普已被用来减轻这种风险,但可能推断出血风险的增加。因此,我们的目标是通过比较已获得HP和NHP的人来确定HP是否是防止小肾移植患者血栓形成的安全手段。对患者的回顾性审查?&?20?20.从2000年到2015年从2000年到2015年接受肾脏移植的kg。在我们的机构,联合肝素10?单位/千克/小时以来,自2009年以来用作惠普。血栓形成(先前血栓形成,血栓性综合征)和出血(治疗剂量的肝素,凝血病的诊断)的患者被排除在外。鉴定了五十六名患者(HP N?= 46; NHP N?=?10)。基准人口统计学在HP和NHP之间相似。输血频率,外科再探索或HP和NHP之间的血栓发生频率没有统计学差异。 HP组更有可能在Hb中滴下液滴& 20?g / l(67.4%vs 30.0%,p?= 0.038),以及在hb中下降的人&?20?g / l更有可能还需要PRBC输血(63.0%Vs 20.0%,p?= 0.017)。在惠普集团中,那些出血并发症的人具有类似的HB水平,因为那些没有基线和移植后的人。 HP和NHP组的结果对于需要PRBC输血或手术干预的血栓形成或显着的出血并发症没有什么不同。未来的预期研究是探讨预防小肾脏受体的预防血栓形成和PRBC输血的风险的平衡。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号