...
【24h】

Do European agroforestry systems enhance biodiversity and ecosystem services? A meta-analysis

机译:欧洲农林系统是否增强了生物多样性和生态系统服务?荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Agroforestry has been proposed as a sustainable agricultural system over conventional agriculture and forestry, conserving biodiversity and enhancing ecosystem service provision while not compromising productivity. However, the available evidence for the societal benefits of agroforestry is fragmented and does often not integrate diverse ecosystem services into the assessment. To upscale existing case-study insights to the European level, we conducted a meta-analysis on the effects of agroforestry on ecosystem service provision and on biodiversity levels. From 53 publications we extracted a total of 365 comparisons that were selected for the meta-analysis. Results revealed an overall positive effect of agroforestry (effect size = 0.454, p 0.01) over conventional agriculture and forestry. However, results were heterogeneous, with differences among the types of agroforestry practices and ecosystem services assessed. Erosion control, biodiversity, and soil fertility are enhanced by agroforestry while there is no clear effect on provisioning services. The effect of agroforestry on biomass production is negative. Comparisons between agroforestry types and reference land-uses showed that both silvopastoral and silvoarable systems increase ecosystem service provision and biodiversity, especially when compared with forestry land. Mediterranean tree plantation systems should be especially targeted as soil erosion could be highly reduced while soil fertility increased. We conclude that agroforestry can enhance biodiversity and ecosystem service provision relative to conventional agriculture and forestry in Europe and could be a strategically beneficial land use in rural planning if its inherent complexity is considered in policy measures. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:有人建议将农林业作为一种可持续的农业系统,取代传统的农业和林业,在不损害生产力的前提下,保护生物多样性并加强生态系统服务的提供。但是,有关农林业的社会效益的现有证据是零散的,并且通常不会将各种生态系统服务纳入评估。为了将现有的案例研究见解提升到欧洲水平,我们对农林业对生态系统服务提供和生物多样性水平的影响进行了荟萃分析。我们从53个出版物中提取了总共365个比较,这些比较被选择用于荟萃分析。结果表明,农林业比常规农业和林业总体上具有积极作用(效应量= 0.454,​​p <0.01)。但是,结果是不同的,农林业实践类型和评估的生态系统服务之间存在差异。农林业可以增强侵蚀控制,生物多样性和土壤肥力,但对供应服务没有明显影响。农林业对生物量生产的影响是负面的。农林业类型和参考土地用途之间的比较表明,农牧业和可耕种系统都增加了生态系统服务的提供和生物多样性,特别是与林地相比。地中海树木种植系统应特别针对,因为可以大大减少土壤侵蚀而增加土壤肥力。我们得出的结论是,相对于欧洲的常规农业和林业而言,农林业可以提高生物多样性和生态系统服务的提供,并且如果在政策措施中考虑其固有的复杂性,则可以成为农村规划中具有战略意义的土地使用。 (C)2016 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号