首页> 外文期刊>Pediatric emergency care >Parental Knowledge of Appropriate Placement of Child Restraint Systems Before and After Educational Intervention in a Pediatric Emergency Department
【24h】

Parental Knowledge of Appropriate Placement of Child Restraint Systems Before and After Educational Intervention in a Pediatric Emergency Department

机译:儿童抑制系统在儿科急诊室教育干预前后适当安置儿童约束系统的父母知识

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective This study aimed to determine caregiver's knowledge of appropriate car restraint systems (CRSs) use and compare this with the actual use among children presenting to the pediatric emergency department (PED), and to determine the efficacy of PED-based intervention on improving knowledge. Methods We conducted a prospective, intervention study of children (<8 years old) during a 12-month period in the PED. Based on their height and weight, children were assigned to group 1 (rear facing), group 2 (forward facing), or group 3 (booster). Caregivers were surveyed in their baseline CRS knowledge. Certified child passenger safety technicians evaluated each CRS and gave caregivers one-on-one education. Participants were called back to answer a posttest to determine if the information given was retained. Results Of the 170 children enrolled, 64 (37.6%) were assigned to group 1, 68 (40%) to group 2, and 38 (22.3%) to group 3. Of these, 63% were not aware of the state law regarding CRS use. Among those without a CRS, 18% belonged to group 1, 36% to group 2, and 46% to group 3. Even among those who reportedly had CRS, 13% of children did not have one-on-on inspection. After inspection, 84% of group 1, 71% of group 2, and 70% of group 3 were in the appropriate one. Nearly 45% were not compliant with American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines of children riding in rear-facing CRS until 2 years of age. Conclusions A significant proportion of children visiting the PED are not in appropriate CRS, and caretaker knowledge about correct CRS types and installation is poor. Future educational efforts should focus on rear-facing and booster seat age-group children.
机译:目的本研究旨在确定护理人员对适当的汽车克制系统(CRSS)使用的了解,并将其与呈现给儿科急诊部(PED)的儿童的实际使用,并确定PED的干预对提高知识的疗效。方法我们在PED的12个月内进行了对儿童(<8岁)的前瞻性干预研究。基于它们的身高和体重,将儿童分配给第1组(后面),第2组(前锋面向)或第3组(助推器)。在他们的基线CRS知识中调查了护理人员。经过认证的儿童乘客安全技术人员评估每个CR,并给予护理人员一对一的教育。参与者被召回回答后测试以确定所提供的信息是否保留。注册的170名儿童的结果64(37.6%)分配给第1组,68(40%)至第2组,38名(22.3%)到3.其中,63%不了解国家法律CRS使用。在没有CRS的人中,18%属于第1组,36%至第2组,46%至第3组。即使是据报道,13%的儿童没有一次检查。在检查后,84%的第1组,71%的第2组和70%的第3组在适当的中。近45%的人不符合美国儿童科学院的儿童学院,儿童骑在后面的CRS中骑行至2岁。结论访问PED的大量儿童不属于适当的CRS,以及关于正确CRS类型和安装的看法知识很差。未来的教育努力应专注于后面和助推器座年龄组儿童。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号