首页> 外文期刊>Pedobiologia >Comparison of fatty acid methyl ester methods for characterization of microbial communities in forest and arable soil: Phospholipid fraction (PLFA) versus total ester linked fatty acids (EL-FAME)
【24h】

Comparison of fatty acid methyl ester methods for characterization of microbial communities in forest and arable soil: Phospholipid fraction (PLFA) versus total ester linked fatty acids (EL-FAME)

机译:脂肪酸甲酯方法对森林和耕地微生物群体表征的比较:磷脂馏分(PLFA)与总酯连接脂肪酸(EL-MAME)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) and ester-linked fatty acid methyl ester (EL-FAME) extraction methods have been commonly used for estimating microbial biomass and characterizing microbial community composition in soil. However, to our knowledge, there is currently no comparison of these two methods across different ecosystems. A regression analysis for 8 different soils showed that there were significant linear relationships between PLFA and EL-FAME extracts (r(2) = 0.97, 0.98 and 0.72, respectively) for determining the fungal (18:20)6,9) and bacterial abundance and fungal-to-bacterial ratio (F:B ratio). However, regression lines of forest soils for fungal abundance and F:B ratio had a slight but significantly higher intercept than those of arable soils, i.e. higher EL-FAME:PLFA ratio for fungi in forests than those in arable soils. This might be due to that EL-FAME extracts may have additional factors such as physiological status of fungi and the inclusion of substantial amount of humic substances that affect quantitative determination of fungal biomass. Overall, EL-FAME method is simple and would produce similar results to PLFA method for bacteria in both quantitative and qualitative assessments when comparing different soils across ecosystems. However, for fungi, PLFA method would be more suitable than EL-FAME method.
机译:磷脂脂肪酸(PLFA)和酯连接的脂肪酸甲酯(EL-M)提取方法常用于估计微生物生物质并表征土壤中的微生物群落组合物。然而,为了我们的知识,目前没有对不同生态系统中这两种方法的比较。 8种不同土壤的回归分析表明,PLFA和EL-MAME提取物(r(2)= 0.97,0.98和0.72分别)之间存在显着的线性关系,用于测定真菌(18:20)6,9)和细菌丰度和真菌 - 细菌比(F:B比)。然而,用于真菌丰度的森林土壤的回归线和F:B的比率比植物土壤的截留微小但显着更高,即森林中森林中的真菌的较高抗体,比耕种土壤更高。这可能是由于EL-MAME提取物可能具有额外的因素,例如真菌的生理状态,并包含影响真菌生物量定量测定的大量腐殖质物质。总的来说,El-MAME方法很简单,并且在比较生态系统中的不同土壤时,对定量和定性评估中的细菌的PLFA方法产生类似的结果。然而,对于真菌,PLFA方法将比EL-MAME方法更加合适。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Pedobiologia》 |2017年第2017期|共5页
  • 作者单位

    Yokohama Natl Univ Grad Sch Environm &

    Informat Sci Soil Ecol Res Grp 79-7 Tokiwadai Yokohama Kanagawa 2408501 Japan;

    Yokohama Natl Univ Grad Sch Environm &

    Informat Sci Soil Ecol Res Grp 79-7 Tokiwadai Yokohama Kanagawa 2408501 Japan;

    Hokkaido Univ Tomakomai Expt Forest Tomakomai Hokkaido 0530035 Japan;

    Yokohama Natl Univ Grad Sch Environm &

    Informat Sci Soil Ecol Res Grp 79-7 Tokiwadai Yokohama Kanagawa 2408501 Japan;

    Chiba Univ Dept Hort Plant Nutr Lab Matsudo Chiba 2718510 Japan;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 土壤生物学;
  • 关键词

    Microbial community structure; Biomarker; Neutral lipids; Lipid extraction;

    机译:微生物群落结构;生物标志物;中性脂质;脂质提取;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号