首页> 外文期刊>Pediatric Pulmonology >A mixed-methods evaluation of stakeholder perspectives on pediatric pneumonia in Nigeria-priorities, challenges, and champions
【24h】

A mixed-methods evaluation of stakeholder perspectives on pediatric pneumonia in Nigeria-priorities, challenges, and champions

机译:尼日利亚优先事项,挑战和冠军儿科肺炎的利益攸关方观点的混合方法评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background Interventions to reduce pneumonia mortality exist; however, stakeholder engagement is needed to prioritize these. We explored diverse stakeholder opinions on current policy challenges and priorities for pediatric pneumonia in Nigeria. Methods We conducted a mixed-methods study, with a web-survey and semi-structured interviews, to explore stakeholder roles, policy barriers, opportunities, and priorities. Web-survey participants were identified through stakeholder mapping, including researchers' networks, academic and grey literature, and "Every Breath Counts" coalition membership. Stakeholders included actors involved in pediatric pneumonia in Nigeria from non-governmental, government, academic, civil society, private, and professional organizations. Stakeholder interviews were conducted with local government, healthcare managers, professional associations, and local leaders in Lagos and Jigawa states. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively; qualitative data were analyzed using a thematic framework. Results Of 111 stakeholders, 38 (34%) participated in the web-survey and 18 stakeholder interviews were conducted. Four thematic areas emerged: current policy, systems barriers, intervention priorities, and champions. Interviewees reported a lack of pneumonia-specific policies, despite acknowledging guidelines had been adopted in their settings. Barriers to effective pneumonia management were seen at all levels of the system, from the community to healthcare to policy, with key issues of resourcing and infrastructure. Intervention priorities were the strengthening of community knowledge and improving case management, focused on primary care. While stakeholders identified several key actors for pediatric pneumonia, they also highlighted a lack of champions. Conclusion Consistent messages emerged to prioritize community and primary care initiatives, alongside improved access to oxygen, and pulse oximetry. There is a need for clear pneumonia policies, and support for adoption at a state level.
机译:存在减少肺炎死亡率的背景干预;但是,需要利益相关者参与要求这些优先考虑这些。我们探讨了关于当前尼日利亚小儿肺炎的当前政策挑战和优先事项的多元化利益相关者的意见。方法我们进行了一项混合方法研究,具有网络调查和半结构化访谈,探索利益相关方的角色,政策障碍,机会和优先事项。通过利益相关方映射确定了网络调查参与者,包括研究人员的网络,学术和灰色文学,以及“每次呼吸计数”联盟会员资格。利益攸关方包括来自非政府,政府,学术,民间社会,私营和专业组织的尼日利亚参与儿科肺炎的演员。利益相关者采访是与当地政府,医疗管理人员,职业协会和拉各斯和贾瓦瓦国家的当地领导人进行的。描述了定量数据;使用主题框架分析定性数据。 111名利益攸关方的结果参加了38名(34%)参加了网络调查和18个利益攸关方访谈。出现了四个专题领域:目前的政策,系统障碍,干预优先事项和冠军。受访者报告缺乏肺炎特定的政策,尽管在其环境中采用了承认指导方针。在系统的各级,从社区到医疗保健,对政策的各级都可以看到有效肺炎管理的障碍,并具有资源和基础设施的关键问题。干预优先事项是加强社区知识和改善案例管理,专注于初级保健。虽然利益攸关方确定了几个小儿肺炎的主要演员,但它们也强调了缺乏冠军。结论始终如一的消息,优先考虑社区和初级保健举措,以及改善对氧气的进入和脉搏血管术。需要清晰的肺炎政策,并支持在国家级采用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号