首页> 外文期刊>Agriculture and Human Values >Food sovereignty or the human right to adequate food: which concept serves better as international development policy for global hunger and poverty reduction?
【24h】

Food sovereignty or the human right to adequate food: which concept serves better as international development policy for global hunger and poverty reduction?

机译:粮食主权或获得充足食物的人权:哪种概念更适合作为全球饥饿和减贫的国际发展政策?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The emerging concept of food sovereignty refers to the right of communities, peoples, and states to independently determine their own food and agricultural policies. It raises the question of which type of food production, agriculture and rural development should be pursued to guarantee food security for the world population. Social movements and non-governmental organizations have readily integrated the concept into their terminology. The concept is also beginning to find its way into the debates and policies of UN organizations and national governments in both developing and industrialized countries. Beyond its relation to civil society movements little academic attention has been paid to the concept of food sovereignty and its appropriateness for international development policies aimed at reducing hunger and poverty, especially in comparison to the human right to adequate food (RtAF). We analyze, on the basis of an extensive literature review, the concept of food sovereignty with regard to its ability to contribute to hunger and poverty reduction worldwide as well as the challenges attached to this concept. Then, we compare the concept of food sovereignty with the RtAF and discuss the appropriateness of both concepts for national public sector policy makers and international development policies. We conclude that the impact on global food security is likely to be much greater if the RtAF approach predominated public policies. While the concept of food sovereignty may be appropriate for civil society movements, we recommend that the RtAF should obtain highest priority in national and international agricultural, trade and development policies. copyright Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012.
机译:新兴的粮食主权概念是指社区,人民和国家独立决定自己的粮食和农业政策的权利。它提出了一个问题,即应采取哪种粮食生产,农业和农村发展来保障世界人口的粮食安全。社会运动和非政府组织已经很容易将这一概念整合到他们的术语中。这个概念也开始在发展中国家和工业化国家的联合国组织和各国政府的辩论和政策中找到应用。除了它与民间社会运动的关系以外,很少有人在学术上关注粮食主权的概念及其对旨在减少饥饿和贫困的国际发展政策的适用性,特别是与获得充足食物的人权相比(RtAF)。我们在广泛的文献综述的基础上,分析了粮食主权的概念及其在世界范围内为促进饥饿和减贫做出贡献的能力以及这一概念带来的挑战。然后,我们将粮食主权概念与RtAF进行了比较,并讨论了这两种概念对国家公共部门政策制定者和国际发展政策的适用性。我们得出的结论是,如果RtAF方法主导公共政策,那么对全球粮食安全的影响可能会更大。虽然粮食主权的概念可能适合民间社会运动,但我们建议,区域贸易协定应在国家和国际农业,贸易和发展政策中获得最高优先地位。版权所有Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2012。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号