首页> 外文期刊>Pakistan Veterinary Journal >Comparative Study of Two Point-of-Care Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays for the Detection of Antibodies against Canine Parvovirus and Canine Distemper Virus
【24h】

Comparative Study of Two Point-of-Care Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays for the Detection of Antibodies against Canine Parvovirus and Canine Distemper Virus

机译:两点酶联免疫吸附试验对犬犬剖腹管病毒和犬瘟热病毒的抗体检测的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study was conducted to compare two commercially available point-of-care enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits (TiterCHEK (R) and ImmunoComb (R)) for the detection of antibodies against CPV and CDV. Dogs were clinically healthy, and included 22 (21%) beagles and 83 (79%) Korean native bobtailed dogs admitted to an animal shelter. Of the 105 dogs, 89 (84.76%) were found positive for CPV protective antibody titers (PATs) by HI assay and 3 (2.85%) were identified as positive for CDV PATs by SN assay. The CPV PAT was significantly higher (Pearson correlation coefficient= 0.297, P= 0.002) in adult dogs (= 1 year) than that in young dogs (1 year). For an accurate identification of CPV and CDV PATs, although not statistically significant, the specificity (100% for both CPV and CDV) and positive predictive values (PPV, 100% for both CPV and CDV) of the TiterCHEK were higher than those of the ImmunoComb (specificities for CPV and CDV, 81.3% and 97.1%; PPV for CPV and CDV, 81.3% and 97.1%, respectively). The TiterCHEK had fewer false-positive results than the ImmunoComb. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that shows compare sensitivity and specificity between the TiterCHEK (R) and ImmunoComb (R) kits, using CPV HI and CDV SN as reference tests. (C) 2017 PVJ. All rights reserved
机译:进行该研究以比较用于检测CPV和CDV的抗体的两种市售的护理酶联免疫吸附试剂盒(Titerchek(R)和ImmunoComb(R))。狗在临床上健康,包括22(21%)的猎犬和83名(79%)韩国本地人群犬入侵动物庇护所。在105只狗中,将89(84.76%)发现阳性CPV保护抗体滴度(PATS),HI测定,通过SN测定鉴定为CDV PATS的3(2.85%)。 CPV PAT在成年犬(& = 1年)中显着升高(Pearson相关系数= 0.297,p = 0.002),而不是年轻犬(& 1年)。为了准确识别CPV和CDV PATS,虽然没有统计学意义,但TITITERCHEK的特异性(CPV和CDV和CPV的100%)和阳性预测值(PPV,100%)高于那些免疫环(CPV和CDV的特异性,81.3%和97.1%; PPV分别为CPV和CDV,81.3%和97.1%)。 Titerchek的假阳性结果较少,而不是免疫动蛋白。据我们所知,这是第一项研究,该研究显示使用CPV HI和CDV SN作为参考测试的CPV HI和CDV SN比较Titerchek(R)和ImmunoComb(R)试剂盒之间的敏感性和特异性。 (c)2017 PVJ。版权所有

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号