首页> 外文期刊>Pain medicine : >Management of complex regional pain syndrome type I in upper extremity-evaluation of continuous stellate ganglion block and continuous infraclavicular brachial plexus block: a pilot study.
【24h】

Management of complex regional pain syndrome type I in upper extremity-evaluation of continuous stellate ganglion block and continuous infraclavicular brachial plexus block: a pilot study.

机译:复杂的区域疼痛综合征I型中的综合性疼痛综合征I型 - 连续发星神经节块和连续灌注臂丛林砌块评价:试验研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Interventional pain management techniques play an important role in the multidisciplinary approach to management of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). In this preliminary study we compared the efficacy of continuous stellate ganglion (CSG) block with that of continuous infraclavicular brachial plexus (CIBP) block in management of CRPS type I of upper extremity. METHODS: Thirty-three patients with CRPS type I of upper extremity were randomly assigned to either CSG or CIBP group. Patients were treated for 1 week with continuous infusion of 0.125% bupivacaine at 2and 5mL/h, respectively. Catheter was removed at 1 week and patients were followed up for 4 weeks. The outcome was evaluated in terms of neuropathic pain scale score (NPSS), edema scores (Grades 0-2), and range of motion (ROM) of all upper extremity joints (Grades 0-2). RESULTS: CIBP group showed statistically significant improvement in NPSS compared with CSG group during the first 12 hours after the procedures (P value <0.05). After 12 hours, the NPSS was comparable between the groups. At 4 weeks, both groups showed clinically significant improvement in edema score and ROM of all upper extremity joints when compared with the baseline. CONCLUSION: This preliminary study suggests that CIBP block and CSG block may be feasible and effective interventional techniques for the management of CRPS type I of upper extremities. Hence, we recommend a larger well-randomized, well-controlled, clinical trial to confirm our findings and determine if any significant difference exists between the groups in terms of long-term pain relief and functional restoration.
机译:介入疼痛管理技术在复杂的区域疼痛综合征(CRPS)的多学科方法中起着重要作用。在该初步研究中,我们将连续星状神经节(CSG)块与连续血管臂丛(CIBP)块的疗效进行了比较了在上肢的CRPS型I中的连续血管臂丛丛(CIBP)块的功效。方法:随机分配给CSG或CIBP组的三十三名CRPS型CRP型患者。患者在2和5mL / h处连续输注0.125%Bupivacaine的患者进行1周。导管在1周内除去,患者随访4周。在所有上肢关节的神经病疼痛评分(NPSS),水肿分数(等级0-2)和运动范围(ROM)范围(等级0-2)中,评估结果。结果:CIBP组在手术后的前12小时内与CSG组相比,NPS的统计学上显着改善(P值<0.05)。 12小时后,NPS在组之间相当。在4周,两组与基线相比,两组在水肿评分和所有上肢关节的ROM中显示出临床显着改善。结论:该初步研究表明,CIBP块和CSG块可能是用于管理上肢的CRP I型I的可行性和有效的介入技术。因此,我们建议较大良好的随机性,受控良好,临床试验,以确认我们的研究结果,并确定在长期疼痛缓解和功能恢复方面的群体之间存在任何显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号