...
首页> 外文期刊>Pain medicine : >Prevalence of neuropathic pain according to the IASP grading system in patients with chronic non-malignant pain
【24h】

Prevalence of neuropathic pain according to the IASP grading system in patients with chronic non-malignant pain

机译:慢性非恶性疼痛患者IASP分级系统的神经病疼痛患病率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: The primary objective was to determine the prevalence of neuropathic pain according to the new International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) grading system. The secondary objective was to compare the system classification of neuropathic pain with the classification of neuropathic pain according to a patient-administered screening questionnaire. Setting: A Multidisciplinary Pain Center. Subjects: One hundred twenty patients with a variety of chronic pain conditions referred to a multidisciplinary pain center. Methods: Consecutively referred patients filled out the PainDETECT Questionnaire before the first consultation. During the first consultation, patients had pain history taken and bedside examination performed by a pain specialist. Patients were classified according to the score on the PainDETECT Questionnaire and graded according to the IASP grading system about the certainty of neuropathic pain. Results: According to the IASP grading system, 22 patients (18.3%) classified as probable or definite neuropathic pain and 90 patients (75%) as unlikely neuropathic pain. According to the PainDETECT Questionnaire, 55 patients (45%) were classified as likely neuropathic pain and 13 patients (10.8%) as unlikely neuropathic pain. Eleven patients (20%) who were classified as neuropathic pain according to PainDETECT were also classified as probable or definite neuropathic pain by the new IASP grading system. Conclusions: According to the new IASP grading system, less than 20% of the patients referred to a multidisciplinary pain center fulfilled the criteria for neuropathic pain. The classification of neuropathic pain with the IASP system varies from the classification of neuropathic pain with the use of a self-administered screening questionnaire.
机译:目的:主要目的是根据新的国际痛苦协会确定神经性疼痛的患病率。次要目的是根据患者施用的筛查问卷进行神经病疼痛的分类来比较神经性疼痛的系统分类。设置:多学科疼痛中心。受试者:一百二十名患者,各种慢性疼痛条件称为多学科疼痛中心。方法:连续提到患者在第一次咨询之前填写止痛药问卷。在第一次咨询期间,患者患有痛苦的历史和痛苦专家进行的床边检查。根据止痛调查问卷的得分分类,根据IASP评分系统对神经病疼痛的确定性进行分类。结果:根据IASP分级系统,22名患者(18.3%)分类为可能或明确的神经性疼痛和90名患者(75%),如不太神经性疼痛。根据止痛调查问卷,55名患者(45%)被归类为神经性疼痛和13名患者(10.8%),因​​为神经性疼痛不太可能。根据止痛药被归类为神经性疼痛的11名患者(20%)也被新的IASP分级系统归类为可能或明确的神经性疼痛。结论:根据新的IASP分级系统,不到20%的患者提到的多学科疼痛中心符合神经病疼痛的标准。随着IASP系统的分类因使用自我管理的筛选问卷而异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号