首页> 外文期刊>Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment: An International Journal for Scientific Research on the Relationship of Agriculture and Food Production to the Biosphere >Effect of no-tillage with weed cover mulching versus conventional tillage on global warming potential and nitrate leaching
【24h】

Effect of no-tillage with weed cover mulching versus conventional tillage on global warming potential and nitrate leaching

机译:免耕杂草覆盖与常规耕作对全球变暖潜力和硝酸盐淋失的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abandoned agricultural land could potentially accumulate soil organic carbon (SOC) when it is no longer used for cultivation and is allowed to revert to natural vegetation. In Japan, no tillage with weed mulching will be adopted in marginal farmland as a new organic farming system because this system minimizes the disturbance of the soil ecosystem and reduces the cost for crop production. The present study aimed to compare the effects of two organic farming systems, namely no-tillage with weed cover mulching and conventional tillage (CT), and two organic fertilizer application modes, namely no fertilizer (N-) and organic fertilizer (N+; 50 kg N ha(-1) during 2010 and 2011 and 80 kg N ha(-1) during 2012) on greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes, soil carbon sequestration, net global warming potential (GWP), and nitrate leaching. Pumpkin (Cucurbita spp.) was cultivated as the main crop in 2010 and 2011, whereas mixed cropping of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.), bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.), and eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) was implemented in 2012. Tillage management increased CH4 uptake immediately after the tillage; however, the effects did not continue in the long term. On the contrary, NTW increased CH4 uptake, and the soil carbon content at the soil surface linearly increased every year after conversion to NTW indicating that improving soil physics by continuing NTW contributed to enhanced CH4 uptake. N2O emissions in NTW were higher only immediately after a weed mowing; however, NTW did not increase the annual N2O emission. In addition, the difference between initial and final SOC (Delta SOC) was greater in NTW than in CT, which significantly decreased net GWP in NTW in comparison with CT. Nitrate leaching was 48.6% and 47.3% lower in NTW than in CT at soil depths of 30-60 and 60-90 cm, respectively. These results show that no-tillage with weed cover mulching contributed to conserve the regional and global environment by reducing nitrate leaching and net GWP from the agro-ecosystem by increasing the annual CH4 uptake and soil carbon sequestration. This system will be adopted for abandoned agricultural land because it reduces net GWP shortly after conversion to this management. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:当废弃的农业用地不再用于耕种并被允许恢复为天然植被时,它可能会积累土壤有机碳(SOC)。在日本,边缘农田将不采用任何覆盖杂草的耕作方式作为新的有机耕作系统,因为该系统可最大程度地减少对土壤生态系统的干扰并降低农作物生产的成本。本研究旨在比较两种有机耕作制度的影响,即免耕杂草覆盖和常规耕作(CT),以及两种有机肥料施用模式,即无肥料(N-)和有机肥料(N +; 50) 2010年和2011年的kg N ha(-1)和2012年期间的80 kg N ha(-1))涉及温室气体(GHG)通量,土壤固碳,净全球变暖潜能(GWP)和硝酸盐淋失。南瓜(Cucurbita spp。)是2010和2011年的主要农作物,而秋葵(Abelmoschus esculentus L.),甜椒(Capsicum annuum L.)和茄子(Solanum melongena L.)的混合作物于2012年实施耕作管理增加了耕作后的甲烷吸收量;但是,这种影响不会长期持续下去。相反,NTW增加了CH4的吸收,并且转换为NTW后每年土壤表面的土壤碳含量线性增加,这表明通过持续进行NTW改善土壤物理状况有助于增加CH4的吸收。仅在修剪杂草后,NTW中的N2O排放才更高。但是,NTW并未增加年度N2O排放量。此外,NTW的初始和最终SOC之间的差异(增量SOC)比CT大,与CT相比,NTW的净GWP显着降低。在土壤深度为30-60 cm和60-90 cm的土壤中,NTW的硝酸盐浸出率分别比CT低48.6%和47.3%。这些结果表明,免耕覆盖草覆盖通过增加每年的CH4吸收和土壤固碳来减少农业生态系统中的硝酸盐淋失和净GWP,从而有助于保护区域和全球环境。该系统将用于废弃的农业用地,因为它在转换为该管理方式后不久会降低净GWP。 (C)2014 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号