首页> 外文期刊>Agriculture >Weed Control Using Conventional Tillage, Reduced Tillage, No-Tillage, and Cover Crops in Organic Soybean
【24h】

Weed Control Using Conventional Tillage, Reduced Tillage, No-Tillage, and Cover Crops in Organic Soybean

机译:在有机大豆中使用常规耕种,减耕,免耕和覆盖作物进行杂草控制

获取原文
           

摘要

Soybean field experiments were performed to investigate the weed-suppressing effects of different tillage systems and cover crop mulches at two locations in southwest Germany during 2014 and 2015. The influence of three different tillage systems on weed control efficacy, soybean plant density, and crop yield was determined. In the no-till system (NT), two different cover crops, (rye and barley), were treated by a roller-crimper before soybean sowing. For the reduced tillage system (RT), shallow soil cultivation (7.5 cm depth) using a cultivator after cover crop harvest was performed. The third system was conventional tillage (CT), which used a plow (25 cm depth) without any previous cover crop treatment. Finally, a CT system without weed control was used as a control treatment (C). Weed densities in the field experiments ranged from 1 to 164 plants m ?2 with Chenopodium album (L.), Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) P. Beauv., and Sonchus arvensis (L.) as the predominant weed species. No difference in weed suppression was found between the two cover crops. The highest cover crop soil coverage was measured in the NT treatment. The greatest weed density (164 plants m ?2 ) was measured in the untreated control. CT, RT and NT reduced weed density up to 71%, 85%, and 61%, respectively, to C, across both locations and years. Soybean plant density was reduced in NT (?36%) and CT (?18%) based on aimed sown plant density. Highest crop yields up to 2.4 t ha ?1 were observed in RT, while NT resulted in lower yields (1.1 t ha ?1 ). Our work reveals the importance of cover crops for weed suppression in soybean cropping systems without herbicide application.
机译:进行了大豆田间试验,调查了2014年和2015年德国西南部两个地方不同耕作制度和覆盖农作物覆盖物的除草效果。三种不同耕作制度对杂草防治效果,大豆植物密度和农作物产量的影响被确定。在免耕系统(NT)中,在播种大豆之前,先用滚筒式压接机处理两种不同的覆盖作物(黑麦和大麦)。对于减耕系统(RT),在收获农作物后使用中耕机进行浅土栽培(7.5厘米深)。第三个系统是常规耕作(CT),该耕作使用的犁耕机(深度25厘米)未经任何以前的作物遮盖处理。最后,将没有杂草控制的CT系统用作对照处理(C)。在野外实验中,杂草的密度范围为1至164株植物,每平方米2个,其中主要的杂草物种为藜属(L.),E草(Echinochloa crus-galli(L.)P. Beauv。)。在两种覆盖作物之间未发现杂草抑制作用的差异。在NT处理中测得的最高覆盖作物土壤覆盖率。在未处理的对照中测得最大杂草密度(164株植物m 2)。在各个地点和年份,CT,RT和NT将杂草密度降低至C分别高达71%,85%和61%。基于目标播种的植物密度,大豆的密度在NT(?36%)和CT(?18%)降低。在RT中观察到最高的农作物产量达2.4 t ha?1,而NT导致较低的产量(1.1 t ha?1)。我们的工作表明,在不使用除草剂的情况下,覆盖作物对于抑制大豆种植系统中杂草的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号