首页> 外文期刊>Pain. >What do clinicians consider when assessing chronic low back pain? A content analysis of multidisciplinary pain centre team assessments of functioning, disability, and health
【24h】

What do clinicians consider when assessing chronic low back pain? A content analysis of multidisciplinary pain centre team assessments of functioning, disability, and health

机译:临床医生在评估慢性低腰疼痛时考虑什么? 多学科疼痛中心团队对功能,残疾和健康的评估的内容分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Beyond expert suggestions as to the appropriate subject matter for chronic pain assessments, little is known about the actual content of multidisciplinary pain centre (MPC) clinical assessments. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Low Back Pain Core Set (ICF LBP-CS) provides a universal language to support the consistent description of LBP-related assessments across disciplines within multidisciplinary teams (MDTs). This study sought to map the content of MPC clinical assessments to the ICF to: (1) identify and compare the content of clinical MDT assessments using a cross-disciplinary framework and (2) examine the content validity of the LBP-CS. A qualitative examination of MPC team clinical assessments of chronic low back pain was undertaken. Multidisciplinary team (pain medicine, psychiatry, nursing, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, and psychology) assessments were audio-recorded and transcribed. Concepts were extracted from transcripts using a meaning condensation procedure and then linked to the ICF. Across 7 MDTassessments, comprised 42 discipline-specific assessments and 241,209 transcribed words, 8596 concepts were extracted. Contextual factors (ie, the person and environment), except for physiotherapy, accounted for almost half of each discipline's assessments (range: 49%-58%). Concepts spanned 113 second-level ICF categories, including 73/78 LBP-CS categories. Overall, the findings revealed novel insights into the content of MPC clinical assessments that can be used to improve health care delivery. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health-based assessment profiles demonstrated unique contributions from each discipline to chronic low back pain assessment. Finally, users of the LBP-CS can be confident that the tool exhibits sound content validity from the perceptive ofMDT assessments of functioning, disability, and health.
机译:除了适用于慢性疼痛评估的适当主题的专家建议,关于多学科疼痛中心(MPC)临床评估的实际含量毫无疑问。国际运作,残疾和健康腰痛核心集(ICF LBP-CS)的国际分类提供了一种普遍的语言,以支持多学科团队(MDTS)内的纪律的与伦敦相关评估的一致描述。本研究试图将MPC临床评估的内容映射到ICF至:(1)使用跨学科框架和(2)检查LBP-CS的内容有效性识别和比较临床MDT评估的内容。对MPC团队的定性检查进行了慢性低腰疼痛的临床评估。多学科团队(止痛药,精神病学,护理,物理疗法,职业治疗和心理学)评估是录制和转录的。使用含义凝结程序从转录物中提取概念,然后与ICF连接。在7个MDTassessments,包括42个学科的特定评估,并提取了8596个概念的241,209个转录词。除了物理治疗外,占每个学科评估的几乎一半(范围:49%-58%)占了上下一半。概念跨越113个级别的ICF类别,包括73/78个LBP-CS类别。总体而言,调查结果揭示了对可用于改善医疗保健递送的MPC临床评估内容的新颖见解。国际运作,残疾和基于卫生的评估概况的国际分类表现出每条学科的独特贡献,以慢性腰痛评估。最后,LBP-CS的用户可以相信该工具从具有功能,残疾和健康的患者评估的感知展示了良好的内容有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号