首页> 外文期刊>Pain. >A phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, safety, tolerability, and efficacy study of Xtampza ER in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic low back pain
【24h】

A phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, safety, tolerability, and efficacy study of Xtampza ER in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic low back pain

机译:患有中度至重度慢性低腰疼痛的患者XTampza er的阶段3,多中心,随机,双盲,安慰剂,安全性,耐受性和疗效研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Opioid analgesics are commonly used for the treatment of chronic low back pain (CLBP); however, abuse potential is a major concern. This study used a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, enriched-enrollment randomized-withdrawal study design to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and analgesic efficacy of an abuse-deterrent formulation of extended-release oxycodone, Xtampza ER, in opioid-naive and opioid-experienced adults with moderate-to-severe CLBP. Patients entered an open-label titration phase (N = 740); those who were successfully titrated on Xtampza ER (>40 to <160 mg oxycodone hydrochloride equivalent per day) were randomized to active drug (N 5 193) or placebo (N 5 196) for 12 weeks. Primary efficacy results showed a statistically significant difference in average pain intensity from randomization baseline to treatment week 12 between the Xtampza ER and placebo groups (mean [+/- SE], -1.56 [0.267]; P < 0.0001). All sensitivity analyses results supported the primary result of the study. Secondary efficacy outcomes indicated that Xtampza ER vs placebo had more patients with improvement in patient global impression of change (26.4% vs 14.3%; P < 0.0001), longer time-to-exit from the study (58 vs 35 days; P = 0.0102), and a greater proportion of patients with >= 30% (49.2% vs 33.2%; P = 0.0013) and >= 50% (38.3% vs 24.5%; P = 0.0032) improvement in pain intensity. There was less rescue medication (acetaminophen) use in the Xtampza ER treatment group than in the placebo group. Xtampza ER had an adverse event profile consistent with other opioids and was well tolerated; no new safety concerns were identified. In conclusion, Xtampza ER resulted in clinically and statistically significant efficacy in patients with CLBP.
机译:阿片类药物镇痛药通常用于治疗慢性低腰痛(CLBP);但是,滥用潜力是一个主要问题。本研究使用随机,双盲,安慰剂控制,富集的入学随机抽出研究设计,以评估滥用羟考酮,Xtampza er,阿片类药物的滥用 - 威慑制剂的安全性,耐受性和镇痛效果 - 天真和阿片类药物经验丰富的成年人,具有中度至严重的CLBP。患者进入开放标签滴定阶段(n = 740);在Xtampza ER(> 40至<160毫克羟氢酮每天盐酸辛酮)上成功滴定的那些被随机化为活性药物(N 5 193)或安慰剂(N 5 196)12周。初级疗效结果表明,来自随机化基线的平均疼痛强度与XTampza ER和安慰剂组之间的治疗周12的平均疼痛强度差异(平均值[+/- SE],-1.56 [0.267]; p <0.0001)。所有敏感性分析结果支持了研究的主要结果。二次疗效结果表明,Xtampza er Vs安慰剂有更多患者患者全球变化印象的改善(26.4%vs14.3%; p <0.0001),从研究中延长时间(58 vs 35天; P = 0.0102 )和更大比例的患者> = 30%(49.2%Vs 33.2%; p = 0.0013),> = 50%(38.3%vs 24.5%; p = 0.0032)改善疼痛强度。在XTampza ER治疗组中使用较少的救援药物(乙酰氨基酚),而不是安慰剂组。 Xtampza ER与其他阿片类药物一致的不良事件概况,耐受良好;没有确定新的安全问题。总之,Xtampza er导致CLBP患者的临床和统计学显着的疗效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号