首页> 外文期刊>Pain research & management: the journal of the Canadian Pain Society = journal de la socie?te? canadienne pour le traitement de la douleur >Patient and Physician Satisfaction with Analgesic Treatment: Findings from the Analgesic Treatment for Cancer Pain in Southeast Asia (ACE) Study
【24h】

Patient and Physician Satisfaction with Analgesic Treatment: Findings from the Analgesic Treatment for Cancer Pain in Southeast Asia (ACE) Study

机译:患者和医生满意与镇痛治疗:东南亚癌症疼痛镇痛治疗的结果(ACE)研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Aim. The aim of this study was to examine patients’ and physicians’ satisfaction, and concordance of patient-physician satisfaction with patients’ pain control status. Methods. This cross-sectional observational study involved 465 adults prescribed analgesics for cancer-related pain from 22 sites across Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam. Pain intensity, pain control satisfaction, and adequacy of analgesics for pain control were documented using questionnaires. Results. Most patients (84.4%) had stage III or IV cancer. On a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worse pain), patients’ mean worst pain intensity over 24 hours was 4.76 (SD 2.47). More physicians (19.0%) than patients (8.0%) reported dissatisfaction with patient’s pain control. Concordance of patient-physician satisfaction was low (weighted kappa 0.36; 95% CI 0.03–0.24). Most physicians (71.2%) found analgesics to be adequate for pain control. Patients’ and physicians’ satisfaction with pain control and physician-assessed analgesic adequacy were significantly different across countries (P<0.001 for all). Conclusions. Despite pain-related problems with sleep and quality of life, patients were generally satisfied with their pain control status. Interestingly, physicians were more likely to be dissatisfied with patients’ pain control. Enhanced patient-physician communication, physicians’ proactivity in managing opioid-induced adverse effects, and accessibility of analgesics have been identified to be crucial for successful cancer pain management. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier NCT02664987).
机译:目的。本研究的目的是审查患者和医生的满意度,并对患者的疼痛控制状态的患者 - 医生满意度的一致性。方法。这种横截面观测研究涉及465名成年人在印度尼西亚,马来西亚,菲律宾,新加坡,泰国和越南的22个地点的癌症相关疼痛的规定镇痛药。用问卷记录疼痛强度,疼痛控制满意度和镇痛药的充分性。结果。大多数患者(84.4%)有III阶段或IV癌症。在0(无疼痛)至10(疼痛较差)的范围内,患者的意思是24小时超过24小时的最严重的疼痛强度为4.76(SD 2.47)。更多的医生(19.0%)比患者(8.0%)报道对患者的疼痛控制不满。患者 - 医师满意度的一致性低(加权Kappa 0.36; 95%CI 0.03-0.24)。大多数医生(71.2%)发现镇痛药充足疼痛控制。患者和医生对疼痛控制和医生评估的镇痛充足性的满意度在各国中显着差异(P <0.001)。结论。尽管与睡眠和生活质量存在痛苦的问题,但患者通常对疼痛控制状态感到满意。有趣的是,医生更有可能对患者的疼痛控制不满意。增强患者 - 医师通信,医生在管理阿片类药物诱导的不良反应方面的疗程,并确定了镇痛药的可访问性对成功癌症疼痛管理至关重要。本研究在ClinicalTrials.gov(标识符NCT02664987)注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号