...
首页> 外文期刊>Pain research & management: the journal of the Canadian Pain Society = journal de la socie?te? canadienne pour le traitement de la douleur >The Analgesic Efficacy of Transverse Abdominis Plane Block versus Epidural Block after Caesarean Delivery: Which One Is Effective? TAP Block? Epidural Block?
【24h】

The Analgesic Efficacy of Transverse Abdominis Plane Block versus Epidural Block after Caesarean Delivery: Which One Is Effective? TAP Block? Epidural Block?

机译:剖腹产骨架与硬膜外块的镇痛疗效剖腹产:哪一个是有效的? 点击块? 硬膜外块?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction and Objective. TAP block has gained popularity to provide postoperative analgesia after abdominal surgery but its advantage over epidural analgesia is disputed. For lower abdominal surgeries, epidural analgesia has been the gold standard and time-tested technique for providing postoperative analgesia, but contraindications for the same would warrant need for other equally good analgesic techniques. The objective of this study is to compare the analgesic efficacy of both the techniques. Materials and Methods. Eighty patients in the ASA I-II risk group, undergone an elective C-section, were randomly assigned to the study. In the TAP group, before the C-section, a single-dose spinal anaesthesia was performed by administering 3 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine to the patients when they were in the sitting position. After the C-section, an ultrasound-guided bilateral TAP block was performed in these patients in the recovery room for postoperative analgesia. In the single-dose EPI group, the patients received 16 cc of isobaric bupivacaine, 3 mg of morphine, and 50 mcg of fentanyl, making a total volume of 20 cc and being administered to the epidural space. Results. A higher level of patient satisfaction was observed in the EPI group (p = 0.003). The amount (mg) of total analgesics received by the patients in the first 24 hours of the postoperative period was statistically significantly higher (p = 0.021) in the TAP group compared to the EPI group. The visual analogue scale (VAS) scores of the EPI group were significantly lower compared to that of the TAP group (p <0.001). Conclusion. The epidural anaesthesia is still the golden standard to achieve a postcaesarean analgesia. Epidural anaesthesia is a considerably effective method in controlling the postoperative pain. We are of the opinion that epidural anaesthesia should be preferred in the first place to achieve a successful postcaesarean analgesia as it provides more effective pain control.
机译:介绍和目标。 Tap Block在腹部手术后提供术后镇痛,但它对硬膜外镇痛的优势是有争议的。对于较低的腹部手术,硬膜外镇痛是提供术后镇痛的金标准和时间测试的技术,但对其同样的禁忌症是需要其他同样良好的镇痛技术。本研究的目的是比较这两种技术的镇痛效果。材料和方法。 ASA I-II风险组中八十名患者随机分配给研究。在TAP组中,在C截面之前,当在坐姿时,通过向患者施用3ml 0.5%高压布酸,通过向患者施用3ml 0.5%的高压布酸,进行单剂量脊髓麻醉。在C系列之后,在术后镇痛的恢复室中的这些患者中进行超声引导的双侧抽头块。在单剂量EPI组中,患者接受了16毫升的等因素Bupivacaine,3毫克吗啡和50mc芬太尼,制成了20cc的总体积并施用于硬膜外空间。结果。在EPI组中观察到更高水平的患者满意度(p = 0.003)。与EPI组相比,患者在术后期间的前24小时内接受患者的总镇痛药的总镇痛药物(P = 0.021)。与Tap组相比,EPI组的视觉模拟量表(VAS)分数显着降低(P <0.001)。结论。硬膜外麻醉仍然是实现后期镇痛的黄金标准。硬膜外麻醉是控制术后疼痛的相当有效的方法。我们认为硬膜外麻醉应该首先是达到成功的后期镇痛,因为它提供更有效的疼痛控制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号