...
首页> 外文期刊>P & T: a peer-reviewed journal for formulary management >Impact of Physician Engagement During Formulary Decision-Making on Prescribing Practices and Formulary Adherence at an Academic Medical Center
【24h】

Impact of Physician Engagement During Formulary Decision-Making on Prescribing Practices and Formulary Adherence at an Academic Medical Center

机译:医师参与在学术医疗中心的规定实践和正式依从性期间的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

ABSTRACT Purpose: To measure the impact of physician engagement during the formulary decision-making (FDM) process on formulary adherence. Methods: A retrospective review of formulary decisions made at an academic medical center during a three-year period was conducted. Decisions that could be evaluated for formulary adherence were assessed for whether pharmacists engaged the requesting physician during the FDM process, based on email contact or P&T committee meeting attendance. Comparison of formulary adherence, specifically medication utilization compliant with formulary restrictions, was made between decisions involving and not involving physician engagement. Nonformulary use was quantified for both groups. The relationship of factors and their potential influence on formulary adherence was examined. Acceptance by the P&T committee of the initial recommendation brought forward by a pharmacist-led FDM group was compared between engaged and unengaged cohorts. Results: Of 139 decisions made effective during the evaluation period, 64 could be evaluated for adherence. Following exclusion of 22 nonformulary decisions and 13 decisions for low utilization, overall formulary adherence was 94%. Cumulative formulary adherence in the engaged and unengaged cohorts was 96% (n = 3,208 of 3,342) and 90% (n = 1,360 of 1,506), respectively. When compared based on individual decisions, no difference between adherence rates was detected and adherence between cohorts was not affected by assessed covariates. Initial formulary recommendations in the sample were more likely to be modified by the P&T committee if the physician was engaged (20% versus 11%, P - 0.48). Conclusion: Physician engagement during FDM did not significantly affect formulary adherence at an academic medical center. Keywords: formularies, hospital; pharmacy and therapeutics committee; interprofessional relations; guideline adherence; professional education
机译:摘要目的:衡量正式决策期间的医师参与(FDM)过程对正式依从性的影响。方法:进行三年期间在学术医疗中心在学术医疗中心作出的正式决策的回顾性审查。根据电子邮件联系人或P&T委员会的会议出席,评估药剂师是否在FDM流程期间从事申请医师进行了评估的决定。在涉及和不涉及医生参与的决策之间进行了形式依从性,特别是符合正式限制的药物利用的比较。对于这两个组定量不整合使用。检查了因素及其对形式依赖性的潜在影响的关系。 PARMACT-LED FDM集团提出的初步推荐的P&T委员会的P&T委员会在订婚和未登记的队列之间进行了初步推荐。结果:在评估期间有效的139个决定,64可以评估依从项。排除22项不规则决策和13项低利用率的决策后,总体形式依从性为94%。有关和未收入的队列中的累积制质性依从性分别为96%(n = 3,342□3,342),分别为90%(n = 1,360个,为1,506个)。基于个别决策比较,检测到遵守率之间的差异,并且群组之间的依从性不受评估的协变量影响。如果医生订婚(20%对11%,P-0.48),则样品中的初始正义建议更可能被P&T委员会修改。结论:FDM期间的医生参与在学术医疗中心没有显着影响正方形依从性。关键词:配方,医院;药房和治疗委员会;侦查关系;准则遵守;职业教育

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号