...
首页> 外文期刊>Swarm and Evolutionary Computation >A decomposition-based coevolutionary multiobjective local search for combinatorial multiobjective optimization
【24h】

A decomposition-based coevolutionary multiobjective local search for combinatorial multiobjective optimization

机译:基于分解的共同型多目标本地搜索组合多目标优化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition (MOEA/D) divides a multiobjective optimization problem into a number of single-objective subproblems and solves them in a collaborative way. MOEA/D can be naturally extended by the common, intensification oriented method of local search for solving combinatorial multiobjective optimization problems (CMOPs). However, the performance of MOEA/D strongly depends on the distribution of direction vectors and the decomposition method it adopts. In this paper, an efficient coevolutionary multiobjective local search based on decomposition (CoMOLS/D) is proposed. In CoMOLS/D, two sets of direction vectors and two populations with different decomposition methods are adopted to coevolve with each other. Among them, one population aims to achieve fast convergence while the other one puts more effort for maintaining the complementarily diverse solutions based on the convergence population. In the experimental studies, CoMOLS/D is compared with four decomposition-based local search heuristics, i.e., MOEA/D-LS (WS, TCH, PBI and iPBI); a dominance-based local search, i.e., epsilon-MOEA-LS; an indicator-based local search, i.e., IBEALS; and a state-of-the-art local search with dual populations, i.e., ND/DPP-LS; on two well-known CMOPs. The experimental results show that CoMOLS/D significantly outperforms the compared algorithms on most of the test instances.
机译:基于分解的多目标进化算法(MOEA / D)将多色能优化问题划分为多个单目标子问题,并以协同方式解决它们。 MoeA / D可以通过常见的强化导向方法自然地扩展,用于解决组合多目标优化问题(CMOPS)。然而,MOEA / D的性能强烈取决于它采用的方向载体的分布和分解方法。在本文中,提出了一种基于分解(COMOLS / D)的有效的共耦合多目标局部搜索。在Comols / D中,采用两组方向向量和两个具有不同分解方法的群体来彼此共同携带。其中,一名人口旨在实现快速融合,而另一个人则提供更多努力,以维持基于收敛群体的补充多样化的解决方案。在实验研究中,将COMOLS / D与基于四个分解的本地搜索启发式测量,即MOEA / D-LS(WS,TCH,PBI和IPBI)进行比较;基于优势的本地搜索,即epsilon-moea-ls;基于指示符的本地搜索,即IBEALS;以及与双人口,即nd / dpp-ls的最先进的本地搜索;在两个众所周知的CMOP上。实验结果表明,Comols / D显着优于大多数测试实例的比较算法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号