首页> 外文期刊>Sports medicine >Effects of exercise training on airway hyperreactivity in asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Effects of exercise training on airway hyperreactivity in asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:运动训练对哮喘气道过度反应性的影响:系统评价与荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Although physical exercise is recommended for asthmatics, evidence on the effects of exercise on clinical key factors is still missing. Objectives: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effect of exercise training (EXT) on quality of life (QoL), bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR), exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB), lung function and exercise capacity, plus the factors affecting changes in QoL and exercise capacity in asthmatics after a period of EXT. Data Sources: A computerized search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL (last search on 15 November 2012), without language restriction, and references of original studies and reviews were searched for further relevant studies. Study Selection: Two independent investigators screened full-text studies with asthmatic subjects undertaking EXT (defined as training for ≥7 days, ≥2 times per week, ≥5 training sessions in total) that assessed at least one of the following outcomes: QoL, airway hyperreactivity, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), peak expiratory flow (PEF), inflammatory parameters, exercise capacity, or exercise endurance. Potentially relevant studies were excluded if only respiratory muscle training, breathing exercises or yoga was performed, if asthmatic subjects with co-morbidities were investigated, if only data of mixed patient groups without separate results for asthmatics were presented, if training regimens were not sufficiently specified, if no numerical outcome data were presented, and if new long-term medication was introduced in addition to physical training. Of 500 potentially relevant articles, 13.4 % (67 studies including 2,059 subjects) met the eligibility criteria and were included for further analyses. Study Appraisal and Synthesis Methods: Data extraction and risk of bias assessment was performed according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. A meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed to determine the effect of EXT on asthma symptoms, BHR, EIB, FEV1, exercise capacity and exercise endurance compared with control training. In addition, relative pre/post changes were analysed in all RCTs and controlled trials. Finally, multiple linear regression models were used to identify effects of relative changes in airway hyperreactivity (BHR or EIB), lung function (FEV1 or PEF) and training hours on QoL and exercise performance. Results: In a total of 17 studies including 599 subjects, meta-analyses showed a significant improvement in days without asthma symptoms, FEV1 and exercise capacity while BHR only tended to improve. The analysis of relative within-group changes after EXT showed, however, significant improvements in QoL (17 %), BHR (53 %), EIB (9 %), and FEV1 (3 %) compared with control conditions. Multiple linear regression models revealed that changes in airway hyperreactivity and lung function significantly contributed to the change in QoL, while mainly the changes in airway hyperreactivity contributed to the change in exercise capacity. Conclusion: EXT was shown to improve asthma symptoms, QoL, exercise capacity, BHR, EIB, and FEV1 in asthmatics and improvements in BHR explained part of the improvement in QoL and exercise capacity. Thus, physical activity should be recommended as a supplementary therapy to medication. However, more well controlled studies should be performed assessing the relationship of physical activity, QoL, airway hyperreactivity, lung function and especially airway inflammation as well as medication intake.
机译:背景:虽然建议用于哮喘的体育锻炼,但仍然缺少对运动对临床关键因素的影响的证据。目标:我们进行了系统审查和荟萃分析,以确定运动培训(EXT)对寿命质量(QOL),支气管高反应性(BHR),运动引起的支气管混凝网(EIB),肺功能和运动能力的影响。在ext期间影响QOL变化和哮喘锻炼能力的因素。数据来源:在Medline,Embase和Cinahl(2012年11月15日的最后一次搜索)进行了计算机化搜索,没有语言限制,并搜查了原始研究和评论的参考资料进行进一步的相关研究。学习选择:两位独立调查人员筛选了哮喘科目的全文研究,突出的ext(定义为≥7天的培训,每周≥2次,总共培训= 5个培训课程),评估了以下至少一项结果:QOL,气道超反应性,强制呼气量一秒(FEV1),峰值呼气流(PEF),炎症参数,运动能力或锻炼能力。如果在研究呼吸肌训练,呼吸肌肉训练,呼吸锻炼或瑜伽,则排除潜在的相关研究,如果研究了具有共同病态的哮喘受试者,则仅介绍了没有分开的哮喘患者的混合患者组的数据,如果培训方案没有得到足够的规定,如果没有提出数值结果数据,除了体育训练之外还引入了新的长期药物。 500个潜在的相关文章,13.4%(包括2,059项受试者的67项研究)达到了资格标准,并被包括进一步分析。研究评估和合成方法:根据Cochrane手册进行数据提取和偏见评估的风险,以进行干预措施的系统审查。进行了所有随机对照试验(RCT)的荟萃分析,以确定与对照培训相比,对哮喘症状,BHR,EIB,FEV1,运动能力和锻炼耐力的影响。此外,在所有RCT和对照试验中分析了相对预/后变化。最后,使用多元线性回归模型来识别气道超反应性(BHR或EIB),肺功能(FEV1或PEF)和培训时间对QOL和运动性能的影响。结果:总共17项研究,包括599个受试者,Meta-Analyzes在没有哮喘症状的日子内显示出显着的改善,FEV1和运动能力,而BHR才能倾向于改善。然而,在分析后,胚胎(17%),BHR(53%),EIB(9%)和FEV1(3%)与对照条件相比的相对内变化分析。多个线性回归模型显示,气道超反应性和肺功能的变化显着促进了QOL的变化,而气道超反应性的变化则导致运动能力的变化。结论:EXT显示出改善哮喘症状,QOL,运动能力,BHR,EIB和FEV1,在哮喘和BHR的改进解释了QOL和运动能力的一部分。因此,应建议身体活动作为药物补充疗法。然而,应进行更良好的受控研究,评估身体活动,QOL,气道高反应性,肺功道和尤其是气道炎症以及药物摄入的关系。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Sports medicine》 |2013年第11期|共14页
  • 作者单位

    Exercise Physiology Lab Institute of Human Movement Sciences ETH Zurich Winterthurerstrasse 190;

    Exercise Physiology Lab Institute of Human Movement Sciences ETH Zurich Winterthurerstrasse 190;

    Horten Centre for Patient-Oriented Research and Knowledge Transfer University of Zurich Zurich;

    Exercise Physiology Lab Institute of Human Movement Sciences ETH Zurich Winterthurerstrasse 190;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 运动医学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号