...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Thoracic Disease >Effects of continuous aerobic exercise on lung function and quality of life with asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Effects of continuous aerobic exercise on lung function and quality of life with asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:连续有氧运动对哮喘肺功能和生活质量的影响:系统评价与荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Despite the obvious benefits of aerobic exercise for asthmatic patients, controversies persist. The current study evaluated the effectiveness of continuous aerobic exercise on lung function and quality of life of asthmatic patients. Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases up to May 2019 and included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of asthmatic patients intervened with whole body continuous aerobic exercise (moderate intensity, at least 20 minutes and two times a week, over a minimum period of four weeks), in which the endpoint measures were lung function and asthma-related quality of life. A fixed-effects model (I2≤50%) or random-effects model (I250%) was applied to calculate the pooled effects according to the I2-and Chi-squared (χ2) test, funnel plots were quantified to present publication bias, and a P value 0.05 was statistically significant. Results: Eventually, 22 trials conformed to the selection criteria. In the aerobic exercise group, the forced expiratory volume improved in one second (FEV1) (I2=10.2%, WMD: 0.12, P=0.011), peak expiratory flow (PEF) (I2=87.3%, WMD: 0.66, P=0.002), forced vital capacity (FVC) (I2=0.0%, WMD: 0.18, P0.001), FVC/predict (I2=3.9%, WMD: 4.3, P=0.014), forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of vital capacity (FEF25–75%) (I2=0.0%, WMD: 9.6, P=0.005), Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) (I2=0.0%, WMD: 0.20, P=0.002), and Pediatric Asthma Quality of life Questionnaire (PAQLQ) (I2=72.1%, WMD: 0.81, P0.001), respectively, while no statistical significance existed in FEV1%predict (I2=36.0%, WMD: 0.68, P=0.312) and FEV1/FVC ratio (I2=0.0%, WMD: 0.27, P=0.443) compared with the control group. When the exercise mode was taken into account, we observed significant improvement in FEV1, PEF, and FVC in the swimming (P0.05) or indoor treadmill (P0.05) training group. Conclusions: Our meta-analysis proved that regular continuous aerobic exercise benefits asthma patients on FEV1, PEF, FVC, FVC%pred, FEF25–75%, and quality of life, and was well tolerated, while there were no improvements in FEV1%pred and FEV1/FVC%. As such, swimming and treadmill training may be appropriate options.
机译:背景:尽管有氧运动对哮喘患者的有氧运动有明显的好处,但争议持续存在。目前的研究评估了连续有氧运动对肺功能和哮喘患者生活质量的有效性。方法:我们搜索了Pubmed,Embase,以及对照试验数据库的Cochrane中央登记册,并包括哮喘患者的随机对照试验(RCT),涉及全身连续有氧运动(中等强度,至少20分钟和两次一周,在最短的四周内),其中终点措施是肺功能和哮喘相关的生活质量。施用固定效果模型(I2≤50%)或随机效应模型(I2> 50%),以计算根据I2和Chi平方(χ2)试验,量化漏斗图以显示出现的出版物偏差,P值<0.05在统计上显着。结果:最终,22项试验符合选择标准。在有氧运动组中,强制呼气量在一秒内改善(FEV1)(I2 = 10.2%,WMD:0.12,P = 0.011),峰值呼气流动(PEF)(I2 = 87.3%,WMD:0.66,P = 0.002),强制生命能力(FVC)(I2 = 0.0%,WMD:0.18,P <0.001),FVC /预测(I2 = 3.9%,WMD:4.3,P = 0.014),强制呼气流量在25%和75之间生命能力%(FEF25-75%)(I2 = 0.0%,WMD:9.6,P = 0.005),哮喘质量调查问卷(AQLQ)(I2 = 0.0%,WMD:0.20,P = 0.002)和儿科哮喘的生活质量问卷调查问卷(PAQLQ)(I2 = 72.1%,WMD:0.81,P <0.001),但在FEV1%预测中没有统计学意义(I2 = 36.0%,WMD:0.68,P = 0.312)和FEV1与对照组相比/ FVC比(I2 = 0.0%,WMD:0.27,P = 0.443)。考虑到运动模式时,我们在游泳(P <0.05)或室内跑步机(P <0.05)训练组中观察到FEV1,PEF和FVC的显着改善。结论:我们的荟萃分析证明,定期连续的有氧运动效果哮喘患者FEV1,PEF,FVC,FVC%PEAD,FEF25-75%和生活质量,并且耐受良好,而FEV1%PREV没有改善和fev1 / fvc%。因此,游泳和跑步机培训可能是适当的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号