首页> 外文期刊>Southern Medical Journal >Moral Controversy and Working with Colleagues with a Shared Ethical/Moral Outlook: A National Survey of US Primary Care Physicians
【24h】

Moral Controversy and Working with Colleagues with a Shared Ethical/Moral Outlook: A National Survey of US Primary Care Physicians

机译:道德争论与共同伦理/道德前景的同事们与同事们合作:美国初级保健医生的全国调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: This study assesses physicians' attitudes on the importance of working with colleagues who share the same ethical or moral outlook regarding morally controversial healthcare practices and examines the association of physicians' religious and spiritual characteristics with these attitudes. Methods: We conducted a secondary data analysis of a 2009 national survey that was administered to a stratified random sample of 1504 US primary care physicians (PCPs). In that dataset, physicians were asked: "For you personally, how important is it to work with colleagues who share your ethical/moral outlook regarding morally controversial health care practices?" We examined associations between physicians' religious/spiritual characteristics and their attitudes toward having a shared ethical/moral outlook with colleagues. Results: Among eligible respondents, the response rate was 63% (896/ 1427). Overall, 69% of PCPs indicated that working with colleagues who share their ethical/moral outlook regarding morally controversial healthcare practices was either very important (23%) or somewhat important (46%). Physicians who were more religious were more likely than nonreligious physicians to report that a shared ethical/moral outlook was somewhat/very important to them (P < 0.001 for all measures of religiosity, including religious affiliation, attendance at religious services, intrinsic religiosity, and importance of religion as well as spirituality). Physicians with a high sense of calling were more likely than those with a low sense of calling to report a high importance of having a shared ethical/moral outlook with colleagues regarding morally controversial healthcare practices (multivariate odds ratio 2.5, 95% confidence interval 1.5-4.1). Conclusions: In this national study of PCPs, physicians who identified as religious, spiritual, or having a high sense of calling were found to place a stronger emphasis on the importance of shared ethical/moral outlook with work colleagues regarding morally controversial healthcare practices. Moral controversy in health care may pose a particular challenge for physicians with lower commitments to theological pluralism.
机译:目的:本研究评估了医生对与同事合作的重要性,他们与道德争议的医疗保健行为相同的伦理或道德前景,并考察了与这些态度的医生宗教和精神特征的协会。方法:我们对2009年国家调查进行了二级数据分析,该调查施用于1504名美国初级保健医生(PCP)的分层随机样本。在那个数据集中,医生被问到:“为你个人而言,与在道德/道德前景的同事合作有多么重要?”我们审查了医生宗教/精神特征的协会及其与同事进行共同的道德/道德前景的态度。结果:在合格的受访者中,响应率为63%(896/1427)。总体而言,69%的PCP表示,与分享他们道德/道德前景有关道德争议的医疗保健实践的同事是非常重要的(23%)或有点重要(46%)。更有宗教的医生比非丑陋的医生更有可能报告,共同的道德/道德前景对他们来说有点/非常重要(所有宗教措施,包括宗教信仰,宗教服务的出席,内在宗教信仰宗教和灵性的重要性)。具有很高的呼唤感的医生比那些具有低呼叫感的人,以报告具有关于道德争议医疗保健实践的同事的共同伦理/道德前景的高度重要性(多元赔率比2.5,95%置信区间1.5- 4.1)。结论:在这项全国PCP研究中,发现被确定为宗教,精神,或具有高呼叫感的医生,令人强迫对与道德争议医疗保健实践的共同伦理/道德前景的重要性。医疗保健中的道德争论可能对医生对神学复数较低的医生构成特殊挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号