【24h】

How transparent film applied on dermatologic imaging devices in order to prevent infections affects image quality?

机译:如何在皮肤病学成像装置上施加透明的薄膜以防止感染影响图像质量?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Background In the clinical practice, transparent films are used as sterile interfaces in in vivo dermatologic imaging in order to prevent the transmissions of infections. However, in our experience, the use of a transparent film can alter skin images. Our study aimed to compare the optical quality of a series of different plastic films used as interfaces in order to understand if some might be more suitable for imaging. Materials and methods We tested the optical properties of 11 different protective transparent films that are marketed in France with a transparency meter and a spectrophotometer. Results Transmission, minimal diffusion, amount of gray, and contrast were obtained for each transparent film. Transmission ranged from 93.24% to 96.88% (mean 95.36; standard deviation SD 1.02), minimal diffusion from 88.28% to 123.87% (mean 101.04; standard deviation SD 10.02) and contrast from 11.01 to 15.88 (mean 13.93 and SD 1.3). For some films, the transmission was lower at lower wavelengths. Conclusion All tested films had excellent optical properties. However, some of them had better optical qualities and seemed more suitable for their use in dermatologic imaging.
机译:摘要背景在临床实践中,透明薄膜用作体内皮肤病成像中的无菌界面,以防止感染的传输。然而,在我们的经验中,使用透明胶片可以改变皮肤图像。我们的研究旨在比较用作界面的一系列不同塑料薄膜的光学质量,以便了解有些可能更适合成像。我们测试了11种不同保护性透明薄膜的光学性质,其在法国以透明度计和分光光度计销售。结果为每个透明薄膜透射,最小扩散,灰度量和对比度。传输范围为93.24%至96.88%(平均95.36;标准偏差Sd 1.02),从88.28%到123.87%的最小扩散(平均101.04;标准偏差SD 10.02),与11.01至15.88(平均13.93和SD 1.3)对比度。对于一些薄膜,在较低波长下变速器较低。结论所有测试薄膜具有优异的光学性质。然而,其中一些具有更好的光学品质,并且似乎更适合于他们在皮肤病学成像中使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号