首页> 外文期刊>Seminars in orthodontics >Laboratory evaluation of orthodontic biomechanics: The clinical applications revisited
【24h】

Laboratory evaluation of orthodontic biomechanics: The clinical applications revisited

机译:正畸生物力学的实验室评估:重新审视临床应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The aim of the present review is to discuss the current evidence on laboratory research for studying biomechanical aspects as related to orthodontics and critically appraise the amount of this research that can be translated to clinical level orthodontics. Finite element analyses (FEA) are used often in the field of Orthodontics. The reliability of FEA depends on the geometry of the structure, the material properties, and the loading configuration. The center of resistance is of fundamental importance for the evaluation of movement in Orthodontics. Most simulations for the assessment of the center of resistance involve FEA. Another series of experiments evaluate force and moment from several appliances during orthodontic movement. The Orthodontic Measurement and Simulation System is used in many of these studies. Especially for torque quantification, several bracket/archwire configurations have been tested on multiple devices, however biomechanical differences render difficult the direct comparison of the results. Further, friction during sliding mechanics has been extensively investigated in the laboratory. These ex-vivo friction research protocols show poor reliability, since several different mechanisms are involved in resistance to sliding. A critical appraisal of the literature revealed that in-vitro trials are no substitute for clinical testing and the results of most ex-vivo investigations should not be extrapolated in the clinical practice without skepticism.
机译:本综述的目的是讨论目前关于研究与矫正物相关的生物力学方面的实验室研究的证据,并批判性地评估可以转化为临床正畸学的研究。有限元分析(FEA)通常在正畸域的场上使用。 FEA的可靠性取决于结构的几何形状,材料特性和装载配置。抗性中心对矫正剂的运动评估至关重要。大多数用于评估抵抗心的仿真涉及FEA。另一系列实验评估了在正畸运动期间的几个电器的力量和力矩。正畸测量和仿真系统用于许多这些研究中。特别是对于扭矩量化,在多个设备上测试了几个支架/弓丝配置,但是生物力学差异使得结果的直接比较难以实现。此外,在实验室中已经广泛研究了滑动力学期间的摩擦。这些前体内摩擦研究方案表现出可靠的可靠性,因为有几种不同的机制涉及到滑动的抵抗力。对文献的批判性评估显示,在体外试验中没有替代临床测试,并且在没有怀疑论的情况下,不应在临床实践中推断大多数前体内调查的结果。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Seminars in orthodontics》 |2017年第4期|共8页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Orthodontics School of Dentistry National and Kapodistrian University of Athens;

    Clinic of Orthodontics and Paediatric Dentistry Center of Dental Medicine University of Zurich;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 口腔科学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-20 05:34:46

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号