...
首页> 外文期刊>Scandinavian journal of pain >Patients' subjective acute pain rating scales (VAS, NRS) are fine; more elaborate evaluations needed for chronic pain, especially in the elderly and demented patients
【24h】

Patients' subjective acute pain rating scales (VAS, NRS) are fine; more elaborate evaluations needed for chronic pain, especially in the elderly and demented patients

机译:患者的主观急性疼痛评定尺度(VAS,NRS)很好; 更精细的慢性疼痛所需的评估,特别是在老年人和痴呆患者中

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In this issue of the Scandinavian Journal of Pain, Pardis Zalmay and Amanda C de C Williams publish an interesting study on how a group of lay persons understand the commonly used pain intensity scales [ 1 ]. This group of medical students early in their clinical training, most likely are a more interested and better informed group of persons than the general public, illustrate that our pain-intensity scales can be misunderstood and misinterpreted.Ever since Michael Bond and Issy Pilowsky in 1966 [2] were the first to use and publish the VAS - the Visual Analogue Scale for assessing subjectively experienced pain intensity, this instrument has been ubiquitously used and misused. The expressions "doing VAS" - "VASing" being synonymous with doing a pain-assessment, at least in the Nordic countries.
机译:在斯堪的纳维亚痛苦杂志的这个问题中,Pardis Zalmay和Amanda C de C Williams发表了一个有趣的研究,了解一群人如何了解常用的疼痛强度尺度[1]。 这群医学生早期在他们的临床训练中,最有可能是一个比公众更有兴趣和更好的知情人员,表明我们的痛苦强度可以误解和误解。然而,自迈克尔邦德和伊斯岛普林斯基1966年以来 [2]是首次使用和发布VAS - 用于评估主观经验丰富的疼痛强度的视觉模拟规模,这种仪器已经普遍使用和滥用。 表达“做VAS” - “狂热”是在北欧国家进行痛苦评估的代名词。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号