首页> 外文期刊>Science and engineering ethics >The Ethics of Gene Editing from an Islamic Perspective: A Focus on the Recent Gene Editing of the Chinese Twins
【24h】

The Ethics of Gene Editing from an Islamic Perspective: A Focus on the Recent Gene Editing of the Chinese Twins

机译:从伊斯兰观点的基因编辑的伦理:重点关注近期中国双胞胎的基因编辑

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In light of the development of "CRISPR" technology, new promising advances in therapeutic and preventive approaches have become a reality. However, with it came many ethical challenges. The most recent worldwide condemnation of the first use of CRISPR to genetically modify a human embryo is the latest example of ethically questionable use of this new and emerging field. Monotheistic religions are very conservative about such changes to the human genome and can be considered an interference with God's creation. Moreover, these changes could cause perpetual changes to future generations. The Muslim scholars establish their decisions by addressing five foundations of Islamic law i.e. "maqas.id al shari & x304;`a"; the purposes of the law. These are din & x304; (religion), nafs (life), nasl (progeny), `aql (intellect) and mal (wealth). To achieve this, the five principles should all be met before approval of an experiment like the Chinese embryo modifications; Qas.d (intention) which is achieved in this case as it aims to protect the embryo from HIV. Yaqin & x304; (certainty) and D.arar (injury) were not satisfied as they require strong scientific certainty of the procedures, and evidence of safety. D.arura (necessity) by which the alternatives being compared; in this case more established and proven safe alternatives to protect the HIV transmission from the father are available, so this principle is not met. The final principle is `Urf (custom), by which the social context of using any contemporary technology should be taken in consideration, and clearly this was not achieved. Collectively, germline changes are rejected from an Islamic perspective until the five principles are fulfilled. In the Chinese Twins gene editing case, there was clearly no justification or support for it according to the Muslim Jurisprudence laws. These laws and approaches can serve as an ethical checklist for such controversial research, especially in early stages of the research.
机译:鉴于“CRISPR”技术的发展,治疗和预防方法的新有前进进展已成为现实。然而,随着它的伦理挑战很多。最近的全球谴责第一次使用CRISPR将遗传修改人类胚胎是这种新的和新兴领域的道德上可疑使用的最新例子。一门宗教对人类基因组的这种变化非常保守,可以被认为是对上帝的创作的干扰。此外,这些变化可能导致后代的永久变化。穆斯林学者通过解决伊斯兰法律的五个基础,即“Maqas.id Al Shari&X304;”a“;法律的目的。这些是DIN和X304; (宗教),NAFS(生命),NASL(后代),`AQL(智力)和MAL(财富)。为实现这一目标,在批准中国胚胎修改等实验之前,应该满足五项原则;在这种情况下实现的Qas.d(意图)旨在保护胚胎免受艾滋病毒的影响。 Yaqin&x304; (确定性)和D.Arar(伤害)不满意,因为它们需要强烈的科学确定性和安全证据。 D.Arura(必要性),其中替代方案进行比较;在这种情况下,更建立并证明保护父亲的艾滋病毒传播的安全替代方案可用,因此不符合此原则。最后的原则是“习惯”(定制),应考虑使用任何当代技术的社会背景,显然这是没有实现的。总的来说,从伊斯兰的角度拒绝各种各样的改变,直到五项原则得到满足。在中国双胞胎基因编辑案例中,根据穆斯林法学法律对其显然没有理由或支持。这些法律和方法可以作为这种有争议的研究的道德清单,特别是在研究的早期阶段。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号