首页> 外文期刊>Safety science >Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships from a risk governance perspective: Interpretation and implications
【24h】

Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships from a risk governance perspective: Interpretation and implications

机译:来自风险治理视角的海上自治表面:解释和含义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Recently, there has been a significant interest in industry, regulatory, and academic contexts in the prospects of Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS). Much work focuses on technical developments and discussions on legal, economic, and safety and security implications. There has been less focus and discussion on the role of different societal actors in the decision-making processes concerning the conceptualization, design, and operational implementation of these future vessels. This paper contributes to this discussion by framing the introduction of MASS in a risk governance context. After briefly introducing the International Risk Governance Council's Risk Governance Framework, the different degrees of autonomy of MASS are categorized according to their dominant risk characteristics. Subsequently, implications are drawn for the recommended risk governance strategies in approaching MASS development and implementation, and some future research areas are identified. It is argued that with higher degrees of autonomy, complexities and uncertainties become more important, necessitating an approach to MASS design and implementation where multiple affected stakeholders are included. A reflective discourse is recommended. For MASS degree of autonomy three and four, normative ambiguities may be present. In such cases, a participative discourse is recommended, where a wider societal debate is held regarding appropriate actions.
机译:最近,在海上自治表面船舶(质量)前景中的行业,监管和学术背景上存在重大兴趣。很多工作侧重于关于法律,经济和安全和安全影响的技术发展和讨论。关于不同社会演员在这些未来船舶的概念化,设计和运营执行的决策过程中的作用,令人焦虑和讨论。本文通过在风险治理环境中框架弥补群众的引入有助于讨论。在简要介绍国际风险治理委员会的风险治理框架之后,群众的不同程度的自主权根据其主导风险特征进行分类。随后,为接近大规模发展和实施方面的建议风险治理策略绘制了影响,并确定了一些未来的研究领域。有人认为,具有更高程度的自主权,复杂性和不确定性变得更加重要,需要一种弥撒的群众设计和实施,其中包括多个受影响的利益相关者。建议使用反思性话语。对于大规模的自治程度三和四,可能存在规范的模糊。在这种情况下,建议参与参与话语,在那里举行更广泛的社会辩论就适当的行动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号