首页> 外文期刊>Orthopedics >Benefit of Degenerative Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Removal During Anterior Decompression in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
【24h】

Benefit of Degenerative Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Removal During Anterior Decompression in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

机译:颈椎病前减压期间退行性后纵韧带去除的益处

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

It remains controversial whether degenerative posterior longitudinal ligaments should be removed during anterior decompression procedures for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Few data are available from studies that have compared removing and retaining the degenerative posterior longitudinal ligament. The goal of this retrospective study was to evaluate the benefit of degenerative posterior longitudinal ligament removal during such operations. Clinical data on 130 patients with confirmed degenerative posterior longitudinal ligament who underwent anterior cervical decompression surgery were retrospectively reviewed. All procedures were performed by the same senior orthopedic surgeon at the authors' spinal surgery center. The degenerative posterior longitudinal ligament was removed in 62 patients (group A) and retained in 68 patients (group B). The 130 patients were followed for 36 months. The Japanese Orthopedic Association score improved from 9.0 +/- 2.7 to 14.7 +/- 1.5 in group A and from 9.4 +/- 2.6 to 14.1 +/- 1.7 in group B (P=.028). The recovery rate for spinal cord neurologic function was 66.7% in group A and 61.3% in group B (P=.031). Operating time was longer (P=.002) and the sagittal median diameter of the vertebral canal was enhanced in group A (P<.001). Narrowing of previously enlarged canals occurred at a significantly higher rate in group B (P=.044). No significant difference was found in the rates of common complications between groups. Removal of the degenerative posterior longitudinal ligament in anterior decompression procedures for cervical spondylotic myelopathy appeared to be beneficial and provided more complete decompression and better postoperative outcomes than surgery without removal of the ligament. Although this procedure was generally safe, it required longer operating times, was more technically challenging, and required more experienced surgeons than surgery without removal of the ligament.
机译:是否应在宫颈脊椎病的前减压过程中去除退行性后纵韧带仍然存在矛盾。少量的数据可以从研究比较和保留退行性后纵韧带的研究中获得。该回顾性研究的目标是评估在这些操作期间退行性后纵韧带去除的益处。回顾性综述了130名患有前宫颈减压手术的130例证实退行性后纵韧带的临床资料。所有程序都由作者脊柱外科中心的同一笔骨科外科医生进行。在62名患者(A组)中除去退行性后纵韧带,并保留在68名患者(B组)中。接下来是130名患者36个月。日本矫形关联分数在A组和B组中的9.0 +/- 1.5中提高到14.7 +/- 1.5(P = .028)中的9.4 +/- 2.6至14.1 +/- 1.7。脊髓神经系统的回收率在A组中为66.7%,B组中的61.3%(P = .031)。操作时间更长(p = .002),A组(p <0.001)中增强了椎管的矢状中值。 B组(P = .044)中以明显较高的速率发生先前放大的运河的变窄。在群体之间的常见并发症率下没有发现显着差异。去除宫颈脊椎病的前减压过程中的退化后纵向韧带似乎是有益的,并且提供比手术更完全的减压和更好的术后结果而不会除去韧带。虽然这个程序通常是安全的,但需要更长的操作时间,更加技术上是挑战性的,并且在不除去韧带的情况下,需要比手术更具经验丰富的外科医生。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Orthopedics》 |2015年第1期|共8页
  • 作者单位

    Capital Med Univ Beijing Friendship Hosp Dept Orthoped Beijing 100050 Peoples R China;

    Capital Med Univ Beijing Friendship Hosp Dept Orthoped Beijing 100050 Peoples R China;

    Capital Med Univ Beijing Friendship Hosp Dept Orthoped Beijing 100050 Peoples R China;

    Capital Med Univ Beijing Friendship Hosp Dept Orthoped Beijing 100050 Peoples R China;

    Capital Med Univ Beijing Friendship Hosp Dept Orthoped Beijing 100050 Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 骨科学(运动系疾病、矫形外科学);
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号