...
首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural Economics >Fertilizer subsidies and food self-sufficiency in Indonesia
【24h】

Fertilizer subsidies and food self-sufficiency in Indonesia

机译:印度尼西亚的肥料补贴和粮食自给自足

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Indonesia is a net importer of almost all of its staple foods. National self-sufficiency in food, especially the main staple, rice, is a core objective of economic policy. Poverty reduction is also a core policy objective. Since the 1970s, Indonesia has used agricultural input subsidies, especially on fertilizer, to stimulate agricultural production, largely in pursuit of the goal of rice self-sufficiency. More recently, it has also used output protection, especially in rice, for the same purpose. This article utilizes a multisectoral, multihousehold general equilibrium model of the Indonesian economy to study the trade-offs between the goals of self-sufficiency and poverty reduction when two alternative means are used to achieve them: a fertilizer subsidy, on the one hand, and output protection, on the other. It does this by analyzing the aggregate and distributional effects of these two sets of policies and by comparing their effects with nonintervention. The analysis shows that, in terms of its effects on poverty, a fertilizer subsidy can be a more effective instrument for achieving the goal of rice self-sufficiency than final product import restrictions
机译:印度尼西亚几乎是其所有主食的净进口国。粮食,特别是主要主粮大米的国家自给自足是经济政策的核心目标。减贫也是一项核心政策目标。自1970年代以来,印度尼西亚主要是为了实现稻米自给自足的目标,使用农业投入补贴,特别是化肥补贴来刺激农业生产。最近,出于相同的目的,它还使用了输出保护,尤其是在大米中。本文利用印度尼西亚经济的多部门,多住户一般均衡模型研究自给自足目标与减贫目标之间的权衡取舍,这是通过两种替代方法实现的:一方面是化肥补贴,另一方面是输出保护,另一方面。它通过分析这两套政策的总和​​分配效应,并比较它们与非干预的效应来做到这一点。分析表明,就其对贫困的影响而言,与最终产品进口限制相比,肥料补贴可以更有效地实现大米自给自足的目标

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号