首页> 外文期刊>Oncology Research >Cost-Utility Analysis of Pembrolizumab Versus Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Different PD-L1 Expression Levels
【24h】

Cost-Utility Analysis of Pembrolizumab Versus Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Different PD-L1 Expression Levels

机译:PEMBROLIZUMAB与化疗的成本实用性分析作为具有不同PD-L1表达水平转移性非小细胞肺癌的一线治疗

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

To evaluate the cost-utility of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy as the first-line setting for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from the US health care system perspective, a Markov model was developed to compare the lifetime cost and effectiveness of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for untreated metastatic NSCLC, based on the clinical data derived from phase III randomized controlled trial (KEYNOTE-042; ClinicalTrials.gov ; NCT02220894). Weibull distribution was fitted to simulate the parametric survival functions. Drug costs were collected from official websites, and utility values were obtained from published literature. Total costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were computed as primary output indicators. The impact of different PD-L1 expression levels on ICER was also evaluated. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the model uncertainty. Compared with chemotherapy, patients treated with pembrolizumab provided an additional 1.13, 1.01, and 0.59 QALYs in patients with PD-L1 expression levels of >= 50%, >= 20%, and >= 1%, with corresponding incremental cost of $53,784, $47,479, and $39,827, respectively. The resultant ICERs of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy were $47,596, $47,184, and $68,061/QALY, in three expression levels of PD-L1, respectively, all of which did not exceed the WTP threshold of 180,000/QALY. Probability sensitivity analysis outcome supported that pembrolizumab exhibited evident advantage over chemotherapy to be cost-effective. One-way sensitivity analysis found that ICERs were most sensitive to utility value of pembrolizumab in progression survival state. All the adjustment of parameters did not qualitatively change the result. For treatment-naive, metastatic NSCLC patients with PD-L1(+), pembrolizumab was estimated to be cost-effective compared with chemotherapy for all PD-L1 expression levels at a WTP threshold of $180,000/QALY in the context of the US health care system.
机译:为了评估Pembrolizumab与化疗的成本实用性,作为从美国医疗系统的转移性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的一线设置,Markov模型是开发的,以比较Pembrolizumab与的终身成本和有效性基于III期随机对照试验的临床资料(KeaceNote-042; ClinCONETTrials.gov; NCT02220894)的临床资料,基于未经治疗的转移性NSCLC的化学疗法。 Weibull分布被安装为模拟参数效果。药物成本从官方网站收集,效用价值从发表的文献中获得。总成本,质量调整的终身年(QALYS)和增量成本效益比(ICES)被计算为主要输出指标。还评估了不同PD-L1表达水平的影响。进行单程和概率敏感性分析以评估模型不确定性。与化疗相比,PEMBROLIZUMAB治疗的患者在PD-L1表达水平> = 50%> = 20%和> = 1%的患者中提供了另外的1.13,1.01和0.59qalys,相应的增量成本为53,784美元, 47,479美元和39,827美元。 Pembrolizumab与化疗的所得催化剂分别为47,596美元,47,184美元和68,061美元/ QALY,分别在PD-L1的三个表达水平中,所有这些都不超过180,000 / QALY的WTP阈值。概率敏感性分析结果支持,彭洛丽拟人对化疗表现出明显的优势,具有成本效益。单向敏感性分析发现,ICER对进展生存状态下彭洛洛妥妥的效用价值最敏感。参数的所有调整都没有定性地改变结果。对于治疗 - 天真的转移性NSCLC患者PD-L1(+),彭布罗齐妥珠蛋白患者估计与美国医疗保健的背景下的WTP阈值为180,000美元/ QALY的所有PD-L1表达水平的化学疗法成本效益系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号